Paper
Understanding Usage and Engagement in AI-Powered Scientific Research Tools: The Asta Interaction Dataset
Authors
Dany Haddad, Dan Bareket, Joseph Chee Chang, Jay DeYoung, Jena D. Hwang, Uri Katz, Mark Polak, Sangho Suh, Harshit Surana, Aryeh Tiktinsky, Shriya Atmakuri, Jonathan Bragg, Mike D'Arcy, Sergey Feldman, Amal Hassan-Ali, Rubén Lozano, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Charles McGrady, Amanpreet Singh, Brooke Vlahos, Yoav Goldberg, Doug Downey
Abstract
AI-powered scientific research tools are rapidly being integrated into research workflows, yet the field lacks a clear lens into how researchers use these systems in real-world settings. We present and analyze the Asta Interaction Dataset, a large-scale resource comprising over 200,000 user queries and interaction logs from two deployed tools (a literature discovery interface and a scientific question-answering interface) within an LLM-powered retrieval-augmented generation platform. Using this dataset, we characterize query patterns, engagement behaviors, and how usage evolves with experience. We find that users submit longer and more complex queries than in traditional search, and treat the system as a collaborative research partner, delegating tasks such as drafting content and identifying research gaps. Users treat generated responses as persistent artifacts, revisiting and navigating among outputs and cited evidence in non-linear ways. With experience, users issue more targeted queries and engage more deeply with supporting citations, although keyword-style queries persist even among experienced users. We release the anonymized dataset and analysis with a new query intent taxonomy to inform future designs of real-world AI research assistants and to support realistic evaluation.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23335v1</id>\n <title>Understanding Usage and Engagement in AI-Powered Scientific Research Tools: The Asta Interaction Dataset</title>\n <updated>2026-02-26T18:40:28Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23335v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23335v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>AI-powered scientific research tools are rapidly being integrated into research workflows, yet the field lacks a clear lens into how researchers use these systems in real-world settings. We present and analyze the Asta Interaction Dataset, a large-scale resource comprising over 200,000 user queries and interaction logs from two deployed tools (a literature discovery interface and a scientific question-answering interface) within an LLM-powered retrieval-augmented generation platform. Using this dataset, we characterize query patterns, engagement behaviors, and how usage evolves with experience. We find that users submit longer and more complex queries than in traditional search, and treat the system as a collaborative research partner, delegating tasks such as drafting content and identifying research gaps. Users treat generated responses as persistent artifacts, revisiting and navigating among outputs and cited evidence in non-linear ways. With experience, users issue more targeted queries and engage more deeply with supporting citations, although keyword-style queries persist even among experienced users. We release the anonymized dataset and analysis with a new query intent taxonomy to inform future designs of real-world AI research assistants and to support realistic evaluation.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.HC'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AI'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.IR'/>\n <published>2026-02-26T18:40:28Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.HC'/>\n <author>\n <name>Dany Haddad</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Dan Bareket</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Joseph Chee Chang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jay DeYoung</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jena D. Hwang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Uri Katz</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Mark Polak</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Sangho Suh</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Harshit Surana</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Aryeh Tiktinsky</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Shriya Atmakuri</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jonathan Bragg</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Mike D'Arcy</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Sergey Feldman</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Amal Hassan-Ali</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Rubén Lozano</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Charles McGrady</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Amanpreet Singh</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Brooke Vlahos</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yoav Goldberg</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Doug Downey</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}