Paper
The economic alignment problem of artificial intelligence
Authors
Daniel W. O'Neill, Stefano Vrizzi, Noemi Luna Carmeno, Felix Creutzig, Jefim Vogel
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing exponentially and is likely to have profound impacts on human wellbeing, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Here we argue that the "alignment problem" in AI research is also an economic alignment problem, as developing advanced AI inside a growth-based system is likely to increase social, environmental, and existential risks. We show that post-growth research offers concepts and policies that could substantially reduce AI risks, such as by replacing optimisation with satisficing, using the Doughnut of social and planetary boundaries to guide development, and curbing systemic rebound with resource caps. We propose governance and business reforms that treat AI as a commons and prioritise tool-like autonomy-enhancing systems over agentic AI. Finally, we argue that the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI) may require a new economics, for which post-growth scholarship provides a strong foundation.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21843v1</id>\n <title>The economic alignment problem of artificial intelligence</title>\n <updated>2026-02-25T12:22:46Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21843v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.21843v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing exponentially and is likely to have profound impacts on human wellbeing, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Here we argue that the \"alignment problem\" in AI research is also an economic alignment problem, as developing advanced AI inside a growth-based system is likely to increase social, environmental, and existential risks. We show that post-growth research offers concepts and policies that could substantially reduce AI risks, such as by replacing optimisation with satisficing, using the Doughnut of social and planetary boundaries to guide development, and curbing systemic rebound with resource caps. We propose governance and business reforms that treat AI as a commons and prioritise tool-like autonomy-enhancing systems over agentic AI. Finally, we argue that the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI) may require a new economics, for which post-growth scholarship provides a strong foundation.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='econ.GN'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CY'/>\n <published>2026-02-25T12:22:46Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='econ.GN'/>\n <author>\n <name>Daniel W. O'Neill</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Stefano Vrizzi</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Noemi Luna Carmeno</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Felix Creutzig</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jefim Vogel</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}