Research

Paper

TESTING February 23, 2026

On the Pólya Frequency Order of the de Bruijn Newman Kernel. Certified Failure at Order Five and the Toeplitz Threshold Phenomenon

Authors

Wojciech Michałowski

Abstract

We prove that the classical de Bruijn--Newman kernel $K(u) = Φ(|u|)$, arising in the study of the Riemann zeta function via the de Bruijn--Newman constant, is not a Pólya frequency function of order $5$ (PF$_5$). The proof is computational: we exhibit an explicit $5 \times 5$ Toeplitz minor with rigorously certified negative determinant, established through interval arithmetic at 80-digit precision with formally bounded truncation and rounding errors. At the same Toeplitz configuration we certify positivity of all minors of orders $2$, $3$, and $4$; this shows that the \emph{Toeplitz PF threshold} within the two-parameter family $D_r(u_0,h)$ (Definition 2.1) lies exactly at order $5$ for this configuration, while the global question $K \in \mathrm{PF}_4$ remains an open problem (Section 8). We develop a systematic Toeplitz reduction that collapses the $2r$-dimensional configuration space of the PF$_r$ condition to a two-parameter family $D_r(u_0,h)$ of Toeplitz determinants. An asymptotic analysis in the grid spacing $h \to 0$ reveals leading coefficients $C_r(u_0)$ whose signs govern the PFthreshold. We prove the algebraic decomposition \[ C_r(u_0) \;=\; \sum_{\substack{k_0,\ldots,k_{r-1}\ge 0 \\ k_0+\cdots+k_{r-1}=r(r-1)}} \!\!\Bigl(\prod_{i=0}^{r-1} a_{k_i}(u_0)\Bigr)\, \det\bigl[(i-j)^{k_m}\bigr]_{i,m=0}^{r-1}, \] where $a_k(u_0) = K^{(k)}(u_0)/k!$, and verify that $C_r(u_0) > 0$ for $r \le 4$ at all tested points while $C_5(u_0) < 0$ for $u_0 \in (0, u_0^*)$ with a critical threshold $u_0^* = 0.031139\ldots$ (computed by bisection to 15 digits; see Section 5). This sign pattern, together with the positivity of $C_6$ and $C_7$, reveals a localized failure mechanism specific to order $5$. As a further probe of this phenomenon, we study the Gaussian deformation $K_t(u) = e^{tu^2}Φ(|u|)$ and compute, for each counterexample configuration $(u_0,h)$, the minimal $t$ at which the PF$_5$ violation is healed. This \emph{Toeplitz PF$_5$ Gaussian threshold} $λ_5^*(u_0,h)$ is configuration-dependent and should not be confused with the de Bruijn--Newman constant $Λ$, which concerns the reality of zeros of $H_t$ rather than total positivity of $K_t$.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2602.20313
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: math.CA
Published: 2026-02-23
Fetched: 2026-02-25 06:05

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20313v1</id>\n    <title>On the Pólya Frequency Order of the de Bruijn Newman Kernel. Certified Failure at Order Five and the Toeplitz Threshold Phenomenon</title>\n    <updated>2026-02-23T19:59:05Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20313v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.20313v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>We prove that the classical de Bruijn--Newman kernel $K(u) = Φ(|u|)$, arising in the study of the Riemann zeta function via the de Bruijn--Newman constant, is not a Pólya frequency function of order $5$ (PF$_5$). The proof is computational: we exhibit an explicit $5 \\times 5$ Toeplitz minor with rigorously certified negative determinant, established through interval arithmetic at 80-digit precision with formally bounded truncation and rounding errors. At the same Toeplitz configuration we certify positivity of all minors of orders $2$, $3$, and $4$; this shows that the \\emph{Toeplitz PF threshold} within the two-parameter family $D_r(u_0,h)$ (Definition 2.1) lies exactly at order $5$ for this configuration, while the global question $K \\in \\mathrm{PF}_4$ remains an open problem (Section 8).\n  We develop a systematic Toeplitz reduction that collapses the $2r$-dimensional configuration space of the PF$_r$ condition to a two-parameter family $D_r(u_0,h)$ of Toeplitz determinants. An asymptotic analysis in the grid spacing $h \\to 0$ reveals leading coefficients $C_r(u_0)$ whose signs govern the PFthreshold.  We prove the algebraic decomposition \\[ C_r(u_0) \\;=\\; \\sum_{\\substack{k_0,\\ldots,k_{r-1}\\ge 0 \\\\ k_0+\\cdots+k_{r-1}=r(r-1)}} \\!\\!\\Bigl(\\prod_{i=0}^{r-1} a_{k_i}(u_0)\\Bigr)\\, \\det\\bigl[(i-j)^{k_m}\\bigr]_{i,m=0}^{r-1}, \\] where $a_k(u_0) = K^{(k)}(u_0)/k!$, and verify that $C_r(u_0) &gt; 0$ for $r \\le 4$ at all tested points while $C_5(u_0) &lt; 0$ for $u_0 \\in (0, u_0^*)$ with a critical threshold $u_0^* = 0.031139\\ldots$ (computed by bisection to 15 digits; see Section 5).  This sign pattern, together with the positivity of $C_6$ and $C_7$, reveals a localized failure mechanism specific to order $5$.\n  As a further probe of this phenomenon, we study the Gaussian deformation $K_t(u) = e^{tu^2}Φ(|u|)$ and compute, for each counterexample configuration $(u_0,h)$, the minimal $t$ at which the PF$_5$ violation is healed. This \\emph{Toeplitz PF$_5$ Gaussian threshold} $λ_5^*(u_0,h)$ is configuration-dependent and should not be confused with the de Bruijn--Newman constant $Λ$, which concerns the reality of zeros of $H_t$ rather than total positivity of $K_t$.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='math.CA'/>\n    <published>2026-02-23T19:59:05Z</published>\n    <arxiv:comment>13 pages, 3 tables; interval-arithmetic certification; code available on GitHub</arxiv:comment>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='math.CA'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Wojciech Michałowski</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}