Paper
BASS LVI. Connecting X-ray variability with AGN physical properties and a new path to Cosmological distances
Authors
Matilde Signorini, Federica Ricci, Alessia Tortosa, Stefano Bianchi, Fabio La Franca, Franz E. Bauer, Fiona A. Harrison, Kohei Ichikawa, Arghajit Jana, Michael J. Koss, Tingting Liu, Kyuseok Oh, Alessandro Peca, Meredith Powell, Claudio Ricci, David B. Sanders, Roberto Serafinelli, Daniel Stern, Benny Trakhtenbrot, Ezequiel Treister, Megan Urry
Abstract
X-ray variability is a well-established characteristic of active galactic nuclei (AGN), known to correlate inversely with both the supermassive black hole mass and luminosity, although the degree of each remains a topic of debate. The potential of X-ray variability as a proxy for MBH or for intrinsic LX has led to proposals to use AGN as standard candles to test cosmological models. However, the large intrinsic dispersion in these relations has limited their practical applications. In this work, we investigate the dependence of X-ray variability on AGN physical properties using a sample of 134 Seyfert 1 galaxies from the BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS), which is the largest sample to date, more than three times larger than those used in previous studies. Contrary to earlier findings, we observe that X-ray variability correlates with luminosity just as strongly as with MBH. Furthermore, we still do not find evidence for the expected anti-correlation between variability and Eddington ratio, even when using refined bolometric luminosities from SED fitting to compute the Eddington ratio. From a cosmological perspective, the increased sample size reduces the scatter in the log(L)-log(exvar) relation to ~0.63 dex - a significant improvement over previous results, but still too large to serve as competitive standard candles, when compared to SNIa (uncertainties on distances of ~5-10%) or the L(X)-L(UV) relation in quasars (uncertainties of 10-12%). We tested including the width of broad emission lines as additional parameters, but found that this does not significantly lower the observed dispersion, contrary to previous studies on smaller samples. Finally, we discuss how future X-ray missions such as AXIS and NewAthena will improve this scenario by enabling precise variability measurements for thousands of AGN up to redshift z~3, thereby enabling it as a new cosmological probe.
Metadata
Related papers
Fractal universe and quantum gravity made simple
Fabio Briscese, Gianluca Calcagni • 2026-03-25
POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plan
Marta Moscati, Muhammad Saad Saeed, Marina Zanoni, Mubashir Noman, Rohan Kuma... • 2026-03-25
LensWalk: Agentic Video Understanding by Planning How You See in Videos
Keliang Li, Yansong Li, Hongze Shen, Mengdi Liu, Hong Chang, Shiguang Shan • 2026-03-25
Orientation Reconstruction of Proteins using Coulomb Explosions
Tomas André, Alfredo Bellisario, Nicusor Timneanu, Carl Caleman • 2026-03-25
The role of spatial context and multitask learning in the detection of organic and conventional farming systems based on Sentinel-2 time series
Jan Hemmerling, Marcel Schwieder, Philippe Rufin, Leon-Friedrich Thomas, Mire... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20315v1</id>\n <title>BASS LVI. Connecting X-ray variability with AGN physical properties and a new path to Cosmological distances</title>\n <updated>2026-02-23T20:01:56Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20315v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.20315v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>X-ray variability is a well-established characteristic of active galactic nuclei (AGN), known to correlate inversely with both the supermassive black hole mass and luminosity, although the degree of each remains a topic of debate. The potential of X-ray variability as a proxy for MBH or for intrinsic LX has led to proposals to use AGN as standard candles to test cosmological models. However, the large intrinsic dispersion in these relations has limited their practical applications. In this work, we investigate the dependence of X-ray variability on AGN physical properties using a sample of 134 Seyfert 1 galaxies from the BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS), which is the largest sample to date, more than three times larger than those used in previous studies. Contrary to earlier findings, we observe that X-ray variability correlates with luminosity just as strongly as with MBH. Furthermore, we still do not find evidence for the expected anti-correlation between variability and Eddington ratio, even when using refined bolometric luminosities from SED fitting to compute the Eddington ratio. From a cosmological perspective, the increased sample size reduces the scatter in the log(L)-log(exvar) relation to ~0.63 dex - a significant improvement over previous results, but still too large to serve as competitive standard candles, when compared to SNIa (uncertainties on distances of ~5-10%) or the L(X)-L(UV) relation in quasars (uncertainties of 10-12%). We tested including the width of broad emission lines as additional parameters, but found that this does not significantly lower the observed dispersion, contrary to previous studies on smaller samples. Finally, we discuss how future X-ray missions such as AXIS and NewAthena will improve this scenario by enabling precise variability measurements for thousands of AGN up to redshift z~3, thereby enabling it as a new cosmological probe.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='astro-ph.GA'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='astro-ph.CO'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='astro-ph.HE'/>\n <published>2026-02-23T20:01:56Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>accepted for publication in A&A</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='astro-ph.GA'/>\n <author>\n <name>Matilde Signorini</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Federica Ricci</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Alessia Tortosa</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Stefano Bianchi</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Fabio La Franca</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Franz E. Bauer</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Fiona A. Harrison</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Kohei Ichikawa</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Arghajit Jana</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Michael J. Koss</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Tingting Liu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Kyuseok Oh</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Alessandro Peca</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Meredith Powell</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Claudio Ricci</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>David B. Sanders</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Roberto Serafinelli</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Daniel Stern</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Benny Trakhtenbrot</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Ezequiel Treister</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Megan Urry</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}