Paper
Astra: AI Safety, Trust, & Risk Assessment
Authors
Pranav Aggarwal, Ananya Basotia, Debayan Gupta, Rahul Kulkarni, Shalini Kapoor, Kashyap J., A. Mukundan, Aishwarya Pokhriyal, Anirban Sen, Aryan Shah, Aalok Thakkar
Abstract
This paper argues that existing global AI safety frameworks exhibit contextual blindness towards India's unique socio-technical landscape. With a population of 1.5 billion and a massive informal economy, India's AI integration faces specific challenges such as caste-based discrimination, linguistic exclusion of vernacular speakers, and infrastructure failures in low-connectivity rural zones, that are frequently overlooked by Western, market-centric narratives. We introduce ASTRA, an empirically grounded AI Safety Risk Database designed to categorize risks through a bottom-up, inductive process. Unlike general taxonomies, ASTRA defines AI Safety Risks specifically as hazards stemming from design flaws such as skewed training sets or lack of guardrails that can be mitigated through technical iteration or architectural changes. This framework employs a tripartite causal taxonomy to evaluate risks based on their implementation timing (development, deployment, or usage), the responsible entity (the system or the user), and the nature of the intent (unintentional vs. intentional). Central to the research is a domain-agnostic ontology that organizes 37 leaf-level risk classes into two primary meta-categories: Social Risks and Frontier/Socio-Structural Risks. By focusing initial efforts on the Education and Financial Lending sectors, the paper establishes a scalable foundation for a "living" regulatory utility intended to evolve alongside India's expanding AI ecosystem.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17357v1</id>\n <title>Astra: AI Safety, Trust, & Risk Assessment</title>\n <updated>2026-02-19T13:37:29Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17357v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.17357v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>This paper argues that existing global AI safety frameworks exhibit contextual blindness towards India's unique socio-technical landscape. With a population of 1.5 billion and a massive informal economy, India's AI integration faces specific challenges such as caste-based discrimination, linguistic exclusion of vernacular speakers, and infrastructure failures in low-connectivity rural zones, that are frequently overlooked by Western, market-centric narratives.\n We introduce ASTRA, an empirically grounded AI Safety Risk Database designed to categorize risks through a bottom-up, inductive process. Unlike general taxonomies, ASTRA defines AI Safety Risks specifically as hazards stemming from design flaws such as skewed training sets or lack of guardrails that can be mitigated through technical iteration or architectural changes. This framework employs a tripartite causal taxonomy to evaluate risks based on their implementation timing (development, deployment, or usage), the responsible entity (the system or the user), and the nature of the intent (unintentional vs. intentional).\n Central to the research is a domain-agnostic ontology that organizes 37 leaf-level risk classes into two primary meta-categories: Social Risks and Frontier/Socio-Structural Risks. By focusing initial efforts on the Education and Financial Lending sectors, the paper establishes a scalable foundation for a \"living\" regulatory utility intended to evolve alongside India's expanding AI ecosystem.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CY'/>\n <published>2026-02-19T13:37:29Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CY'/>\n <author>\n <name>Pranav Aggarwal</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Ananya Basotia</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Debayan Gupta</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Rahul Kulkarni</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Shalini Kapoor</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Kashyap J.</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>A. Mukundan</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Aishwarya Pokhriyal</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Anirban Sen</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Aryan Shah</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Aalok Thakkar</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}