Paper

{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23935v1</id>\n    <title>An Empirical Analysis of Google Play Data Safety Disclosures: A Consistency Study of Privacy Indicators in Mobile Gaming Apps</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-25T04:50:21Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23935v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.23935v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>The Google Play marketplace has introduced the Data Safety section to improve transparency regarding how mobile applications (apps) collect, share, and protect user data. This mechanism requires developers to disclose privacy and security-related practices. However, the reliability of these disclosures remains dependent on developer self-reporting, raising concerns about their accuracy. This study investigates the consistency between developer-reported Data Safety disclosures and observable privacy indicators extracted from Android Application Packages (APKs). An empirical analysis was conducted on a dataset of 41 mobile gaming apps. A static analysis approach was used to extract key privacy indicators from APK files, including device IDs, data sharing, personal information access, and location access. These indicators were systematically compared with the corresponding disclosures reported in the Google Play Data Safety labels using a structured consistency evaluation framework. The results revealed varying levels of agreement across privacy categories. Device ID disclosures demonstrated relatively high consistency (87.8%), whereas other indicators exhibited substantial mismatches. Location-related disclosures showed the highest inconsistency rate (56.1%), followed by personal information and data sharing. Comparative analysis between children-oriented and general-audience apps revealed similar mismatch patterns. Also, Chi-square statistical tests indicate that these differences are not statistically significant, suggesting that disclosure inconsistencies are not associated with app category but instead reflect broader ecosystem-level challenges. These findings highlight limitations in the reliability of current marketplace transparency mechanisms and emphasize the need for improved validation and verification approaches to ensure accurate privacy reporting in mobile app ecosystems.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CR'/>\n    <published>2026-03-25T04:50:21Z</published>\n    <arxiv:comment>16 pages, 2 figures, and 4 tables</arxiv:comment>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CR'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Bakheet Aljedaani</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}