Paper
Bridging the Dual Nature: How Integrated Explanations Enhance Understanding of Technical Artifacts
Authors
Lutz Terfloth, Heike M. Buhl, Vivien Lohmer, Michael Schaffer, Friederike Kern, Carsten Schulte
Abstract
Purpose: Understanding a technical artifact requires grasping both its internal structure (Architecture) and its purpose and significance (Relevance), as formalized by Dual Nature Theory. This controlled experimental study investigates whether how explainers address these perspectives affects explainees' understanding. Methods: In a between-subjects experiment, 104 participants received explanations of the board game Quarto! from trained confederates in one of three conditions: Architecture-focused (A), Relevance-focused (R), or Integrated (AR). Understanding was assessed on comprehension (knowing that) and enabledness (knowing how). Results: The A and R conditions produced equivalent understanding despite different explanation content. The AR condition yielded significantly higher enabledness than the focused conditions combined $\mathrm{F}(1, 102) = 4.83$, $p = .030$, $η^2_p = .045$}, while no differences emerged for comprehension. Conclusion: Integrating Architecture and Relevance specifically enhances explainees' ability to apply their understanding in practice, suggesting that fostering agency with technical artifacts requires bridging both perspectives. This has implications for technology education and explainable AI design.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24325v1</id>\n <title>Bridging the Dual Nature: How Integrated Explanations Enhance Understanding of Technical Artifacts</title>\n <updated>2026-03-25T14:07:58Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24325v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.24325v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Purpose: Understanding a technical artifact requires grasping both its internal structure (Architecture) and its purpose and significance (Relevance), as formalized by Dual Nature Theory. This controlled experimental study investigates whether how explainers address these perspectives affects explainees' understanding.\n Methods: In a between-subjects experiment, 104 participants received explanations of the board game Quarto! from trained confederates in one of three conditions: Architecture-focused (A), Relevance-focused (R), or Integrated (AR). Understanding was assessed on comprehension (knowing that) and enabledness (knowing how).\n Results: The A and R conditions produced equivalent understanding despite different explanation content. The AR condition yielded significantly higher enabledness than the focused conditions combined $\\mathrm{F}(1, 102) = 4.83$, $p = .030$, $η^2_p = .045$}, while no differences emerged for comprehension.\n Conclusion: Integrating Architecture and Relevance specifically enhances explainees' ability to apply their understanding in practice, suggesting that fostering agency with technical artifacts requires bridging both perspectives. This has implications for technology education and explainable AI design.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.OH'/>\n <published>2026-03-25T14:07:58Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.OH'/>\n <author>\n <name>Lutz Terfloth</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Heike M. Buhl</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Vivien Lohmer</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Michael Schaffer</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Friederike Kern</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Carsten Schulte</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}