Research

Paper

TESTING March 23, 2026

Proxy-Reliance Control in Conformal Recalibration of One-Sided Value-at-Risk

Authors

Tenghan Zhong

Abstract

We introduce a proxy-reliance-controlled conformal recalibration framework for one-sided Value-at-Risk (VaR), and study a question that existing state-aware methods do not usually isolate: how strongly should the recalibration adjustment depend on an imperfect volatility proxy? We formalize this through a proxy-reliance parameter that continuously interpolates between an approximately constant-shift correction and a fully proxy-scaled correction. This makes proxy reliance a distinct and practically interpretable design choice in one-sided VaR recalibration. We show theoretically that larger proxy reliance increases the responsiveness of the tail adjustment to proxy scale, but also increases stressed-state fragility when the proxy underreacts. Empirically, in rolling out-of-sample tests on a six-ETF panel with VIX-linked state variables, and with supporting evidence from SPY, we find that the empirical value of proxy-reliance control lies in improved stressed-state robustness rather than uniform overall dominance. In particular, when the baseline forecast remains exposed to proxy imperfection in stressed states, lower or intermediate proxy reliance can outperform fully proxy-scaled recalibration in stressed left-tail VaR control.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.22569
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: q-fin.RM
Published: 2026-03-23
Fetched: 2026-03-25 06:02

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22569v1</id>\n    <title>Proxy-Reliance Control in Conformal Recalibration of One-Sided Value-at-Risk</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-23T20:59:44Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22569v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.22569v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>We introduce a proxy-reliance-controlled conformal recalibration framework for one-sided Value-at-Risk (VaR), and study a question that existing state-aware methods do not usually isolate: how strongly should the recalibration adjustment depend on an imperfect volatility proxy? We formalize this through a proxy-reliance parameter that continuously interpolates between an approximately constant-shift correction and a fully proxy-scaled correction. This makes proxy reliance a distinct and practically interpretable design choice in one-sided VaR recalibration.\n  We show theoretically that larger proxy reliance increases the responsiveness of the tail adjustment to proxy scale, but also increases stressed-state fragility when the proxy underreacts. Empirically, in rolling out-of-sample tests on a six-ETF panel with VIX-linked state variables, and with supporting evidence from SPY, we find that the empirical value of proxy-reliance control lies in improved stressed-state robustness rather than uniform overall dominance. In particular, when the baseline forecast remains exposed to proxy imperfection in stressed states, lower or intermediate proxy reliance can outperform fully proxy-scaled recalibration in stressed left-tail VaR control.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='q-fin.RM'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='stat.ME'/>\n    <published>2026-03-23T20:59:44Z</published>\n    <arxiv:comment>44 pages, 4 figures, 9 tables, appendix included</arxiv:comment>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='q-fin.RM'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Tenghan Zhong</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}