Paper
Who Is in the Room? Stakeholder Perspectives on AI Recording in Pediatric Emergency Care
Authors
Alexandre De Masi, Sergio Manzano, Johan N. Siebert, Frederic Ehrler
Abstract
Artificial intelligence systems that record voice and video during pediatric emergencies are emerging as human-computer interaction (HCI) technologies with direct implications for clinical work, promising improvements in documentation, team performance, and post-event debriefing. Yet the perspectives of those most affected, including clinicians, parents, and child patients, remain largely absent from the design and governance of these technologies. This position paper argues that this has direct consequences for the legitimacy and effectiveness of these systems. We examine four areas where these missing perspectives prove consequential (consent, emotional impact, surveillance dynamics, and participatory governance) and propose four positions for reorienting AI recording in pediatric emergency care toward stakeholder-centered HCI inquiry.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23187v1</id>\n <title>Who Is in the Room? Stakeholder Perspectives on AI Recording in Pediatric Emergency Care</title>\n <updated>2026-03-24T13:33:03Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23187v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.23187v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Artificial intelligence systems that record voice and video during pediatric emergencies are\n emerging as human-computer interaction (HCI) technologies with direct implications for clinical work,\n promising improvements in documentation, team performance, and post-event debriefing. Yet the\n perspectives of those most affected, including clinicians, parents, and child patients, remain largely\n absent from the design and governance of these technologies. This position paper argues that this has\n direct consequences for the legitimacy and effectiveness of these systems. We examine four areas where\n these missing perspectives prove consequential (consent, emotional impact, surveillance dynamics, and\n participatory governance) and propose four positions for reorienting AI recording in pediatric emergency\n care toward stakeholder-centered HCI inquiry.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.HC'/>\n <published>2026-03-24T13:33:03Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>Accepted at ACM Interactive Health Conference (IH '26), Porto, Portugal, July 2026. 10 pages, 53 references</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.HC'/>\n <author>\n <name>Alexandre De Masi</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Sergio Manzano</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Johan N. Siebert</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Frederic Ehrler</name>\n </author>\n <arxiv:doi>10.1145/3786579.3804950</arxiv:doi>\n <link href='https://doi.org/10.1145/3786579.3804950' rel='related' title='doi'/>\n </entry>"
}