Paper
Evidence of political bias in search engines and language models before major elections
Authors
Íris Damião, Paulo Almeida, João Franco, Nuno Santos, Pedro C. Magalhães, Joana Gonçalves-Sá
Abstract
Search engines (SEs) and large language models (LLMs) are central to political information access, yet their algorithmic decisions and potential underlying biases remain underexplored. We developed a standardized, privacy-preserving, bot-and-proxy methodology to audit four SEs and two LLMs before the 2024 European Parliament and US presidential elections. We collected answers to approximately 4,360 queries related to elections in five EU countries and 15 US counties, identified political entities and topics in those answers, and mapped them to ideological positions (EU) or issue associations (US). In Europe, SE results disproportionately mentioned far-right entities beyond levels expected from polls, past elections, or media salience. In the US, Google strongly favored topics more important to Republican voters, while other search engines favored issues more relevant to Democrats. LLMs responses were more balanced, although there is evidence of overrepresentation of far-right (and Green) entities. These results show evidence of bias and open important discussions on how even small skews in widely used platforms may influence democratic processes, calling for systematic audits of their outputs.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23474v1</id>\n <title>Evidence of political bias in search engines and language models before major elections</title>\n <updated>2026-03-24T17:39:34Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23474v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.23474v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Search engines (SEs) and large language models (LLMs) are central to political information access, yet their algorithmic decisions and potential underlying biases remain underexplored. We developed a standardized, privacy-preserving, bot-and-proxy methodology to audit four SEs and two LLMs before the 2024 European Parliament and US presidential elections. We collected answers to approximately 4,360 queries related to elections in five EU countries and 15 US counties, identified political entities and topics in those answers, and mapped them to ideological positions (EU) or issue associations (US). In Europe, SE results disproportionately mentioned far-right entities beyond levels expected from polls, past elections, or media salience. In the US, Google strongly favored topics more important to Republican voters, while other search engines favored issues more relevant to Democrats. LLMs responses were more balanced, although there is evidence of overrepresentation of far-right (and Green) entities. These results show evidence of bias and open important discussions on how even small skews in widely used platforms may influence democratic processes, calling for systematic audits of their outputs.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CY'/>\n <published>2026-03-24T17:39:34Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>20 pages, 4 figures; Supplementary Information : Page 22 - 74</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CY'/>\n <author>\n <name>Íris Damião</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Paulo Almeida</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>João Franco</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Nuno Santos</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Pedro C. Magalhães</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Joana Gonçalves-Sá</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}