Research

Paper

TESTING March 23, 2026

Quantifying Uncertainty in FMEDA Safety Metrics: An Error Propagation Approach for Enhanced ASIC Verification

Authors

Antonino Armato, Christian Kehl, Sebastian Fischer

Abstract

Accurate and reliable safety metrics are paramount for functional safety verification of ASICs in automotive systems. Traditional FMEDA (Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis) metrics, such as SPFM (Single Point Fault Metric) and LFM (Latent Fault Metric), depend on the precision of failure mode distribution (FMD) and diagnostic coverage (DC) estimations. This reliance can often leads to significant, unquantified uncertainties and a dependency on expert judgment, compromising the quality of the safety analysis. This paper proposes a novel approach that introduces error propagation theory into the calculation of FMEDA safety metrics. By quantifying the maximum deviation and providing confidence intervals for SPFM and LFM, our method offers a direct measure of analysis quality. Furthermore, we introduce an Error Importance Identifier (EII) to pinpoint the primary sources of uncertainty, guiding targeted improvements. This approach significantly enhances the transparency and trustworthiness of FMEDA, enabling more robust ASIC safety verification for ISO 26262 compliance, addressing a longstanding open question in the functional safety community.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.21770
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cs.AR
Published: 2026-03-23
Fetched: 2026-03-24 06:02

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21770v1</id>\n    <title>Quantifying Uncertainty in FMEDA Safety Metrics: An Error Propagation Approach for Enhanced ASIC Verification</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-23T10:07:21Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21770v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.21770v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>Accurate and reliable safety metrics are paramount for functional safety verification of ASICs in automotive systems. Traditional FMEDA (Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis) metrics, such as SPFM (Single Point Fault Metric) and LFM (Latent Fault Metric), depend on the precision of failure mode distribution (FMD) and diagnostic coverage (DC) estimations. This reliance can often leads to significant, unquantified uncertainties and a dependency on expert judgment, compromising the quality of the safety analysis. This paper proposes a novel approach that introduces error propagation theory into the calculation of FMEDA safety metrics. By quantifying the maximum deviation and providing confidence intervals for SPFM and LFM, our method offers a direct measure of analysis quality. Furthermore, we introduce an Error Importance Identifier (EII) to pinpoint the primary sources of uncertainty, guiding targeted improvements. This approach significantly enhances the transparency and trustworthiness of FMEDA, enabling more robust ASIC safety verification for ISO 26262 compliance, addressing a longstanding open question in the functional safety community.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AR'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.SE'/>\n    <published>2026-03-23T10:07:21Z</published>\n    <arxiv:comment>11 pages, 7 figures</arxiv:comment>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.AR'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Antonino Armato</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Christian Kehl</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Sebastian Fischer</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}