Paper
From Scores to Strategies: Towards Gaze-Informed Diagnostic Assessment for Visualization Literacy
Authors
Kathrin Schnizer
Abstract
Visualization literacy assessments typically rely on correctness to classify performance, providing little evidence about how readers arrive at their answers. We argue that gaze can address this gap as an implicit process signal that complements standardized tests without sacrificing their scalability. Synthesizing findings from visualization and related research, we show that gaze metrics capture cognitive load invisible to accuracy and response time, and reflect strategy differences in attention allocation that track proficiency. We propose assessments that integrate literacy scores with gaze-derived process indicators - component-level attention profiles, integration frequency, and viewing path dispersion - to distinguish fluent comprehension from labored success. This would shift literacy assessment from binary classification toward nuanced characterization of how readers navigate, integrate, and coordinate information across chart components. A roadmap identifies open challenges in empirical grounding, generalizability, assessment design, and practical feasibility.
Metadata
Related papers
Fractal universe and quantum gravity made simple
Fabio Briscese, Gianluca Calcagni • 2026-03-25
POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plan
Marta Moscati, Muhammad Saad Saeed, Marina Zanoni, Mubashir Noman, Rohan Kuma... • 2026-03-25
LensWalk: Agentic Video Understanding by Planning How You See in Videos
Keliang Li, Yansong Li, Hongze Shen, Mengdi Liu, Hong Chang, Shiguang Shan • 2026-03-25
Orientation Reconstruction of Proteins using Coulomb Explosions
Tomas André, Alfredo Bellisario, Nicusor Timneanu, Carl Caleman • 2026-03-25
The role of spatial context and multitask learning in the detection of organic and conventional farming systems based on Sentinel-2 time series
Jan Hemmerling, Marcel Schwieder, Philippe Rufin, Leon-Friedrich Thomas, Mire... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21898v1</id>\n <title>From Scores to Strategies: Towards Gaze-Informed Diagnostic Assessment for Visualization Literacy</title>\n <updated>2026-03-23T12:22:39Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21898v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.21898v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Visualization literacy assessments typically rely on correctness to classify performance, providing little evidence about how readers arrive at their answers. We argue that gaze can address this gap as an implicit process signal that complements standardized tests without sacrificing their scalability. Synthesizing findings from visualization and related research, we show that gaze metrics capture cognitive load invisible to accuracy and response time, and reflect strategy differences in attention allocation that track proficiency. We propose assessments that integrate literacy scores with gaze-derived process indicators - component-level attention profiles, integration frequency, and viewing path dispersion - to distinguish fluent comprehension from labored success. This would shift literacy assessment from binary classification toward nuanced characterization of how readers navigate, integrate, and coordinate information across chart components. A roadmap identifies open challenges in empirical grounding, generalizability, assessment design, and practical feasibility.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.HC'/>\n <published>2026-03-23T12:22:39Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>4 pages, Workshop on Data Literacy for the 21st Century at CHI 2026, April 26, Barcelona, Spain</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.HC'/>\n <author>\n <name>Kathrin Schnizer</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}