Paper
From Technical Debt to Cognitive and Intent Debt: Rethinking Software Health in the Age of AI
Authors
Margaret-Anne Storey
Abstract
Over time, the shared understanding that makes a software system safe to change quietly erodes. This gradual loss of understanding across a team increases cognitive debt, while the loss of captured rationale leads to intent debt. These may become more important, than technical debt in AI-assisted software development. This article proposes a triple debt model to reason about software health. It is built around three interacting debt types: technical debt in code, cognitive debt in people, and intent debt in externalized knowledge. Cognitive debt concerns what people understand; intent debt concerns what is explicitly captured for both people and machines to use in the future.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22106v1</id>\n <title>From Technical Debt to Cognitive and Intent Debt: Rethinking Software Health in the Age of AI</title>\n <updated>2026-03-23T15:36:23Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22106v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.22106v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Over time, the shared understanding that makes a software system safe to change quietly erodes. This gradual loss of understanding across a team increases cognitive debt, while the loss of captured rationale leads to intent debt. These may become more important, than technical debt in AI-assisted software development. This article proposes a triple debt model to reason about software health. It is built around three interacting debt types: technical debt in code, cognitive debt in people, and intent debt in externalized knowledge. Cognitive debt concerns what people understand; intent debt concerns what is explicitly captured for both people and machines to use in the future.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.SE'/>\n <published>2026-03-23T15:36:23Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>9 pages,1 figure</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.SE'/>\n <author>\n <name>Margaret-Anne Storey</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}