Paper
The End of Rented Discovery: How AI Search Redistributes Power Between Hotels and Intermediaries
Authors
Peiying Zhu, Sidi Chang
Abstract
When a traveler asks an AI search engine to recommend a hotel, which sources get cited -- and does query framing matter? We audit 1,357 grounding citations from Google Gemini across 156 hotel queries in Tokyo and document a systematic pattern we call the Intent-Source Divide. Experiential queries draw 55.9\% of their citations from non-OTA sources, compared to 30.8\% for transactional queries -- a 25.1 percentage-point gap ($p < 5 \times 10^{-20}$). The effect is amplified in Japanese, where experiential queries draw 62.1\% non-OTA citations compared to 50.0\% in English -- consistent with a more diverse Japanese non-OTA content ecosystem. For an industry in which hotels have long paid OTAs for demand acquisition, this pattern matters because it suggests that AI search may make hotel discovery less exclusively controlled by commission-based intermediaries.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20062v1</id>\n <title>The End of Rented Discovery: How AI Search Redistributes Power Between Hotels and Intermediaries</title>\n <updated>2026-03-20T15:44:00Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20062v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20062v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>When a traveler asks an AI search engine to recommend a hotel, which sources get cited -- and does query framing matter? We audit 1,357 grounding citations from Google Gemini across 156 hotel queries in Tokyo and document a systematic pattern we call the Intent-Source Divide. Experiential queries draw 55.9\\% of their citations from non-OTA sources, compared to 30.8\\% for transactional queries -- a 25.1 percentage-point gap ($p < 5 \\times 10^{-20}$). The effect is amplified in Japanese, where experiential queries draw 62.1\\% non-OTA citations compared to 50.0\\% in English -- consistent with a more diverse Japanese non-OTA content ecosystem. For an industry in which hotels have long paid OTAs for demand acquisition, this pattern matters because it suggests that AI search may make hotel discovery less exclusively controlled by commission-based intermediaries.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.IR'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AI'/>\n <published>2026-03-20T15:44:00Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>13 pages, 10 tables, Submitted to the 10th Hospitality Finance & Economics Conference (HFE 2026), Tokyo, Japan</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.IR'/>\n <author>\n <name>Peiying Zhu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Sidi Chang</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}