Paper
EdgeCrafter: Compact ViTs for Edge Dense Prediction via Task-Specialized Distillation
Authors
Longfei Liu, Yongjie Hou, Yang Li, Qirui Wang, Youyang Sha, Yongjun Yu, Yinzhi Wang, Peizhe Ru, Xuanlong Yu, Xi Shen
Abstract
Deploying high-performance dense prediction models on resource-constrained edge devices remains challenging due to strict limits on computation and memory. In practice, lightweight systems for object detection, instance segmentation, and pose estimation are still dominated by CNN-based architectures such as YOLO, while compact Vision Transformers (ViTs) often struggle to achieve similarly strong accuracy efficiency tradeoff, even with large scale pretraining. We argue that this gap is largely due to insufficient task specific representation learning in small scale ViTs, rather than an inherent mismatch between ViTs and edge dense prediction. To address this issue, we introduce EdgeCrafter, a unified compact ViT framework for edge dense prediction centered on ECDet, a detection model built from a distilled compact backbone and an edge-friendly encoder decoder design. On the COCO dataset, ECDet-S achieves 51.7 AP with fewer than 10M parameters using only COCO annotations. For instance segmentation, ECInsSeg achieves performance comparable to RF-DETR while using substantially fewer parameters. For pose estimation, ECPose-X reaches 74.8 AP, significantly outperforming YOLO26Pose-X (71.6 AP) despite the latter's reliance on extensive Objects365 pretraining. These results show that compact ViTs, when paired with task-specialized distillation and edge-aware design, can be a practical and competitive option for edge dense prediction. Code is available at: https://intellindust-ai-lab.github.io/projects/EdgeCrafter/
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18739v1</id>\n <title>EdgeCrafter: Compact ViTs for Edge Dense Prediction via Task-Specialized Distillation</title>\n <updated>2026-03-19T10:39:51Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18739v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.18739v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Deploying high-performance dense prediction models on resource-constrained edge devices remains challenging due to strict limits on computation and memory. In practice, lightweight systems for object detection, instance segmentation, and pose estimation are still dominated by CNN-based architectures such as YOLO, while compact Vision Transformers (ViTs) often struggle to achieve similarly strong accuracy efficiency tradeoff, even with large scale pretraining. We argue that this gap is largely due to insufficient task specific representation learning in small scale ViTs, rather than an inherent mismatch between ViTs and edge dense prediction. To address this issue, we introduce EdgeCrafter, a unified compact ViT framework for edge dense prediction centered on ECDet, a detection model built from a distilled compact backbone and an edge-friendly encoder decoder design. On the COCO dataset, ECDet-S achieves 51.7 AP with fewer than 10M parameters using only COCO annotations. For instance segmentation, ECInsSeg achieves performance comparable to RF-DETR while using substantially fewer parameters. For pose estimation, ECPose-X reaches 74.8 AP, significantly outperforming YOLO26Pose-X (71.6 AP) despite the latter's reliance on extensive Objects365 pretraining. These results show that compact ViTs, when paired with task-specialized distillation and edge-aware design, can be a practical and competitive option for edge dense prediction. Code is available at: https://intellindust-ai-lab.github.io/projects/EdgeCrafter/</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CV'/>\n <published>2026-03-19T10:39:51Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>Code is available at: https://intellindust-ai-lab.github.io/projects/EdgeCrafter/</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CV'/>\n <author>\n <name>Longfei Liu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yongjie Hou</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yang Li</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Qirui Wang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Youyang Sha</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yongjun Yu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yinzhi Wang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Peizhe Ru</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Xuanlong Yu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Xi Shen</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}