Research

Paper

AI LLM March 19, 2026

Entropy trajectory shape predicts LLM reasoning reliability: A diagnostic study of uncertainty dynamics in chain-of-thought

Authors

Xinghao Zhao

Abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves LLM accuracy, yet detecting failures cheaply remains elusive. We study whether the shape of uncertainty dynamics across reasoning steps--captured by sampling a few answer completions per step--predicts correctness. We introduce entropy-trajectory monotonicity: a chain is monotone if its per-step answer-distribution entropy decreases at every step. On GSM8K (n=300) with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, monotone chains achieve 68.8% accuracy vs. 46.8% for non-monotone chains (+21.9 pp; Fisher's p=0.0005; OR=2.50). Critically, total entropy reduction is not predictive ($ρ$=-0.06, p=0.31), revealing a shape-over-magnitude dissociation: whether entropy decreases at every step matters, not how much. Violation count 0/1/2 gives 68.8%/50.8%/28.6% accuracy. Token log-probability confidence worsens in calibration with step depth (ECE: 0.186->0.312), and monotonicity achieves +5.8 pp at 73.7% coverage, outperforming scalar baselines at approx 1,500 tokens/question--1/8 the cost of 40-chain self-consistency. Results replicate on Mistral-7B (n=300): monotone chains reach 72.3% vs. 37.6% (+34.7 pp; OR=4.33). Structural properties of uncertainty trajectories are thus more informative than aggregate measures.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.18940
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cs.CL
Published: 2026-03-19
Fetched: 2026-03-20 06:02

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18940v1</id>\n    <title>Entropy trajectory shape predicts LLM reasoning reliability: A diagnostic study of uncertainty dynamics in chain-of-thought</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-19T14:17:16Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18940v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.18940v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves LLM accuracy, yet detecting failures cheaply remains elusive. We study whether the shape of uncertainty dynamics across reasoning steps--captured by sampling a few answer completions per step--predicts correctness.\n  We introduce entropy-trajectory monotonicity: a chain is monotone if its per-step answer-distribution entropy decreases at every step. On GSM8K (n=300) with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, monotone chains achieve 68.8% accuracy vs. 46.8% for non-monotone chains (+21.9 pp; Fisher's p=0.0005; OR=2.50). Critically, total entropy reduction is not predictive ($ρ$=-0.06, p=0.31), revealing a shape-over-magnitude dissociation: whether entropy decreases at every step matters, not how much. Violation count 0/1/2 gives 68.8%/50.8%/28.6% accuracy.\n  Token log-probability confidence worsens in calibration with step depth (ECE: 0.186-&gt;0.312), and monotonicity achieves +5.8 pp at 73.7% coverage, outperforming scalar baselines at approx 1,500 tokens/question--1/8 the cost of 40-chain self-consistency. Results replicate on Mistral-7B (n=300): monotone chains reach 72.3% vs. 37.6% (+34.7 pp; OR=4.33). Structural properties of uncertainty trajectories are thus more informative than aggregate measures.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CL'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.LG'/>\n    <published>2026-03-19T14:17:16Z</published>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CL'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Xinghao Zhao</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}