Research

Paper

TESTING March 18, 2026

Mechanistic Insights into Enhanced Alkaline Oxygen Evolution on Zn-Al Alloy Electrodes

Authors

Abdul Ahad Mamun, Rokon Uddin Mahmud, Shahin Aziz, Muhammad Shahriar Bashar, Ahmed Sharif, Muhammad Anisuzzaman Talukder

Abstract

Electrochemical water electrolysis, which produces clean energy carriers to mitigate carbon emissions, lacks suitable, low-cost electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline water splitting. To address this challenge, we developed Zn-Al alloy electrodes with varying Al contents up to 20 wt.% via powder metallurgy method and conducted electrochemical measurements of the OER in alkaline solution to investigate their catalytic performance. We also performed first-principles calculations to examine their thermodynamic phase stability and electronic structures. Both theoretical and experimental results indicated that incorporating $\geq 20$ wt.% Al into Zn led to thermodynamic phase instability and secondary-phase segregation in Al-rich regions, limiting reaction kinetics and reducing catalytic efficiency. Although the Al content of 5 wt.% into Zn exhibited favorable thermodynamic and electronic characteristics, but its electrochemical performance was inefficient and poor due to inadequate reaction active sites on the surface. In contrast, the 10 wt.% and 15 wt.% Al into Zn showed approximately three- and two-fold increases in anodic exchange current density relative to pure Zn, respectively. Additionally, the anodic overpotential losses ($η_{0,a}$) measured at a current density of 12 mAcm$^{-2}$ were 0.240 V for Zn$_{0.9}$Al$_{0.1}$ and 0.5603 V for Zn$_{0.85}$Al$_{0.15}$, significantly lower than that of pure Zn ($η_{0,a} = 1.086$ V). While Zn$_{0.9}$Al$_{0.1}$ and Zn$_{0.85}$Al$_{0.15}$ showed similar charge transfer resistance ($R_{\rm CT}$), Zn$_{0.9}$Al$_{0.1}$ demonstrated superior reaction kinetics and lower $η_{0,a}$ across all samples tested. Furthermore, the improved kinetics and reduced overpotential of the Zn-Al alloys favorably compare with those of other transition-metal-based catalysts, including Fe-Co-Ni-Mo alloys and Fe-doped CuO.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.17904
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cond-mat.mtrl-sci
Published: 2026-03-18
Fetched: 2026-03-19 06:01

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17904v1</id>\n    <title>Mechanistic Insights into Enhanced Alkaline Oxygen Evolution on Zn-Al Alloy Electrodes</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-18T16:38:42Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17904v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.17904v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>Electrochemical water electrolysis, which produces clean energy carriers to mitigate carbon emissions, lacks suitable, low-cost electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline water splitting. To address this challenge, we developed Zn-Al alloy electrodes with varying Al contents up to 20 wt.% via powder metallurgy method and conducted electrochemical measurements of the OER in alkaline solution to investigate their catalytic performance. We also performed first-principles calculations to examine their thermodynamic phase stability and electronic structures. Both theoretical and experimental results indicated that incorporating $\\geq 20$ wt.% Al into Zn led to thermodynamic phase instability and secondary-phase segregation in Al-rich regions, limiting reaction kinetics and reducing catalytic efficiency. Although the Al content of 5 wt.% into Zn exhibited favorable thermodynamic and electronic characteristics, but its electrochemical performance was inefficient and poor due to inadequate reaction active sites on the surface. In contrast, the 10 wt.% and 15 wt.% Al into Zn showed approximately three- and two-fold increases in anodic exchange current density relative to pure Zn, respectively. Additionally, the anodic overpotential losses ($η_{0,a}$) measured at a current density of 12 mAcm$^{-2}$ were 0.240 V for Zn$_{0.9}$Al$_{0.1}$ and 0.5603 V for Zn$_{0.85}$Al$_{0.15}$, significantly lower than that of pure Zn ($η_{0,a} = 1.086$ V). While Zn$_{0.9}$Al$_{0.1}$ and Zn$_{0.85}$Al$_{0.15}$ showed similar charge transfer resistance ($R_{\\rm CT}$), Zn$_{0.9}$Al$_{0.1}$ demonstrated superior reaction kinetics and lower $η_{0,a}$ across all samples tested. Furthermore, the improved kinetics and reduced overpotential of the Zn-Al alloys favorably compare with those of other transition-metal-based catalysts, including Fe-Co-Ni-Mo alloys and Fe-doped CuO.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cond-mat.mtrl-sci'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='physics.chem-ph'/>\n    <published>2026-03-18T16:38:42Z</published>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cond-mat.mtrl-sci'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Abdul Ahad Mamun</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Rokon Uddin Mahmud</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Shahin Aziz</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Muhammad Shahriar Bashar</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Ahmed Sharif</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Muhammad Anisuzzaman Talukder</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}