Paper
Modeling Changing Scientific Concepts with Complex Networks: A Case Study on the Chemical Revolution
Authors
Sofía Aguilar-Valdez, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb
Abstract
While context embeddings produced by LLMs can be used to estimate conceptual change, these representations are often not interpretable nor time-aware. Moreover, bias augmentation in historical data poses a non-trivial risk to researchers in the Digital Humanities. Hence, to model reliable concept trajectories in evolving scholarship, in this work we develop a framework that represents prototypical concepts through complex networks based on topics. Utilizing the Royal Society Corpus, we analyzed two competing theories from the Chemical Revolution (phlogiston vs. oxygen) as a case study to show that onomasiological change is linked to higher entropy and topological density, indicating increased diversity of ideas and connectivity effort.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17594v1</id>\n <title>Modeling Changing Scientific Concepts with Complex Networks: A Case Study on the Chemical Revolution</title>\n <updated>2026-03-18T11:08:24Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17594v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.17594v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>While context embeddings produced by LLMs can be used to estimate conceptual change, these representations are often not interpretable nor time-aware. Moreover, bias augmentation in historical data poses a non-trivial risk to researchers in the Digital Humanities. Hence, to model reliable concept trajectories in evolving scholarship, in this work we develop a framework that represents prototypical concepts through complex networks based on topics. Utilizing the Royal Society Corpus, we analyzed two competing theories from the Chemical Revolution (phlogiston vs. oxygen) as a case study to show that onomasiological change is linked to higher entropy and topological density, indicating increased diversity of ideas and connectivity effort.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='physics.soc-ph'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CL'/>\n <published>2026-03-18T11:08:24Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>Accepted by the EACL 2026 Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='physics.soc-ph'/>\n <author>\n <name>Sofía Aguilar-Valdez</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}