Paper
Equivalence testing with data-dependent and post-hoc equivalence margins
Authors
Stan Koobs, Nick W. Koning
Abstract
Equivalence testing compares the hypothesis that an effect $μ$ is large against the alternative that it is negligible. Here, `large' is classically expressed as being larger than some `equivalence margin' $Δ$. A longstanding problem is that this margin must be specified but can rarely be objectively justified in practice. We lay the foundation for an alternative paradigm, arguing to instead report a data-dependent margin $\widehatΔ_α$ that bounds the true effect $μ$ with probability $1 - α$. Our key argument is that $\widehatΔ_α$ is more useful than a test outcome at a fixed margin $Δ$, as measured by the guarantees it offers to decision makers. We generalize this to a curve of margins $α\mapsto \widehatΔ_α$, uniformly valid under the post-hoc selection of the margin. These ideas rely on e-values, which we derive for models that are strictly totally positive of order 3, nesting the classical z-test and t-test settings.
Metadata
Related papers
Fractal universe and quantum gravity made simple
Fabio Briscese, Gianluca Calcagni • 2026-03-25
POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plan
Marta Moscati, Muhammad Saad Saeed, Marina Zanoni, Mubashir Noman, Rohan Kuma... • 2026-03-25
LensWalk: Agentic Video Understanding by Planning How You See in Videos
Keliang Li, Yansong Li, Hongze Shen, Mengdi Liu, Hong Chang, Shiguang Shan • 2026-03-25
Orientation Reconstruction of Proteins using Coulomb Explosions
Tomas André, Alfredo Bellisario, Nicusor Timneanu, Carl Caleman • 2026-03-25
The role of spatial context and multitask learning in the detection of organic and conventional farming systems based on Sentinel-2 time series
Jan Hemmerling, Marcel Schwieder, Philippe Rufin, Leon-Friedrich Thomas, Mire... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16213v1</id>\n <title>Equivalence testing with data-dependent and post-hoc equivalence margins</title>\n <updated>2026-03-17T07:44:04Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16213v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.16213v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Equivalence testing compares the hypothesis that an effect $μ$ is large against the alternative that it is negligible. Here, `large' is classically expressed as being larger than some `equivalence margin' $Δ$. A longstanding problem is that this margin must be specified but can rarely be objectively justified in practice. We lay the foundation for an alternative paradigm, arguing to instead report a data-dependent margin $\\widehatΔ_α$ that bounds the true effect $μ$ with probability $1 - α$. Our key argument is that $\\widehatΔ_α$ is more useful than a test outcome at a fixed margin $Δ$, as measured by the guarantees it offers to decision makers. We generalize this to a curve of margins $α\\mapsto \\widehatΔ_α$, uniformly valid under the post-hoc selection of the margin. These ideas rely on e-values, which we derive for models that are strictly totally positive of order 3, nesting the classical z-test and t-test settings.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='math.ST'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='stat.ME'/>\n <published>2026-03-17T07:44:04Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='math.ST'/>\n <author>\n <name>Stan Koobs</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Nick W. Koning</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}