Paper
The Rise of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST): Institutional Massification and the Emergence of a Procedural Epistemology
Authors
Carol Ting
Abstract
It has long been a puzzle why, despite sustained reform efforts, many applied scientific fields remain dominated by Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST), a framework that dichotomizes study results and privileges "statistically significant" findings. This paper examines that puzzle by situating the development and rise of NHST within its historical and institutional context. Taking Actor-Network Theory as a point of entry, the analysis identifies the conditions under which particular inferential technologies stabilize and endure. The analysis shows that, although NHST does not resolve the technical problem of statistical inference, it came to dominate as a social technology that addressed the most pressing institutional challenge of the postwar period: the mass expansion of scientific networks. Under conditions of rapid institutional growth, NHST's technical slippages--purging research context and replacing epistemic judgment with mechanical procedures--became functional features rather than flaws. These features enabled procedural self-sufficiency across settings marked by heterogeneous goals and uneven expertise, thereby sealing NHST's position as the obligatory passage point in many postwar scientific fields.
Metadata
Related papers
Fractal universe and quantum gravity made simple
Fabio Briscese, Gianluca Calcagni • 2026-03-25
POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plan
Marta Moscati, Muhammad Saad Saeed, Marina Zanoni, Mubashir Noman, Rohan Kuma... • 2026-03-25
LensWalk: Agentic Video Understanding by Planning How You See in Videos
Keliang Li, Yansong Li, Hongze Shen, Mengdi Liu, Hong Chang, Shiguang Shan • 2026-03-25
Orientation Reconstruction of Proteins using Coulomb Explosions
Tomas André, Alfredo Bellisario, Nicusor Timneanu, Carl Caleman • 2026-03-25
The role of spatial context and multitask learning in the detection of organic and conventional farming systems based on Sentinel-2 time series
Jan Hemmerling, Marcel Schwieder, Philippe Rufin, Leon-Friedrich Thomas, Mire... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14757v1</id>\n <title>The Rise of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST): Institutional Massification and the Emergence of a Procedural Epistemology</title>\n <updated>2026-03-16T02:41:26Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14757v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.14757v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>It has long been a puzzle why, despite sustained reform efforts, many applied scientific fields remain dominated by Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST), a framework that dichotomizes study results and privileges \"statistically significant\" findings. This paper examines that puzzle by situating the development and rise of NHST within its historical and institutional context. Taking Actor-Network Theory as a point of entry, the analysis identifies the conditions under which particular inferential technologies stabilize and endure. The analysis shows that, although NHST does not resolve the technical problem of statistical inference, it came to dominate as a social technology that addressed the most pressing institutional challenge of the postwar period: the mass expansion of scientific networks. Under conditions of rapid institutional growth, NHST's technical slippages--purging research context and replacing epistemic judgment with mechanical procedures--became functional features rather than flaws. These features enabled procedural self-sufficiency across settings marked by heterogeneous goals and uneven expertise, thereby sealing NHST's position as the obligatory passage point in many postwar scientific fields.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='stat.OT'/>\n <published>2026-03-16T02:41:26Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>29 pages, 6 figures</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='stat.OT'/>\n <author>\n <name>Carol Ting</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}