Paper
Affordable Precision Agriculture: A Deployment-Oriented Review of Low-Cost, Low-Power Edge AI and TinyML for Resource-Constrained Farming Systems
Authors
Riya Samanta, Bidyut Saha
Abstract
Precision agriculture increasingly integrates artificial intelligence to enhance crop monitoring, irrigation management, and resource efficiency. Nevertheless, the vast majority of the current systems are still mostly cloud-based and require reliable connectivity, which hampers the adoption to smaller scale, smallholder farming and underdeveloped country systems. Using recent literature reviews, ranging from 2023 to 2026, this review covers deployments of Edge AI, focused on the evolution and acceptance of Tiny Machine Learning, in low-cost and low-powered agriculture. A hardware-targeted deployment-oriented study has shown pronounced variation in architecture with microcontroller-class platforms i.e. ESP32, STM32, ATMega dominating the inference options, in parallel with single-board computers and UAV-assisted solutions. Quantitative synthesis shows quantization is the dominant optimization strategy; the approach in many works identified: around 50% of such works are quantized, while structured pruning, multi-objective compression and hardware aware neural architecture search are relatively under-researched. Also, resource profiling practices are not uniform: while model size is occasionally reported, explicit flash, RAM, MAC, latency and millijoule level energy metrics are not well documented, hampering reproducibility and cross-system comparison. Moreoever, to bridge the gap between research prototypes and deployment-ready systems, the review also presents a literature-informed deployment perspective in the form of a privacy-preserving layered Edge AI architecture for agriculture, synthesizing the key system-level design insights emerging from the surveyed works. Overall, the findings demonstrate a clear architectural shift toward localized inference with centralized training asymmetry.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15085v1</id>\n <title>Affordable Precision Agriculture: A Deployment-Oriented Review of Low-Cost, Low-Power Edge AI and TinyML for Resource-Constrained Farming Systems</title>\n <updated>2026-03-16T10:38:31Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15085v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.15085v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Precision agriculture increasingly integrates artificial intelligence to enhance crop monitoring, irrigation management, and resource efficiency. Nevertheless, the vast majority of the current systems are still mostly cloud-based and require reliable connectivity, which hampers the adoption to smaller scale, smallholder farming and underdeveloped country systems. Using recent literature reviews, ranging from 2023 to 2026, this review covers deployments of Edge AI, focused on the evolution and acceptance of Tiny Machine Learning, in low-cost and low-powered agriculture. A hardware-targeted deployment-oriented study has shown pronounced variation in architecture with microcontroller-class platforms i.e. ESP32, STM32, ATMega dominating the inference options, in parallel with single-board computers and UAV-assisted solutions. Quantitative synthesis shows quantization is the dominant optimization strategy; the approach in many works identified: around 50% of such works are quantized, while structured pruning, multi-objective compression and hardware aware neural architecture search are relatively under-researched. Also, resource profiling practices are not uniform: while model size is occasionally reported, explicit flash, RAM, MAC, latency and millijoule level energy metrics are not well documented, hampering reproducibility and cross-system comparison. Moreoever, to bridge the gap between research prototypes and deployment-ready systems, the review also presents a literature-informed deployment perspective in the form of a privacy-preserving layered Edge AI architecture for agriculture, synthesizing the key system-level design insights emerging from the surveyed works. Overall, the findings demonstrate a clear architectural shift toward localized inference with centralized training asymmetry.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.ET'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.LG'/>\n <published>2026-03-16T10:38:31Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.ET'/>\n <author>\n <name>Riya Samanta</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Bidyut Saha</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}