Research

Paper

AI LLM March 16, 2026

Understanding Reasoning in LLMs through Strategic Information Allocation under Uncertainty

Authors

Jeonghye Kim, Xufang Luo, Minbeom Kim, Sangmook Lee, Dongsheng Li, Yuqing Yang

Abstract

LLMs often exhibit Aha moments during reasoning, such as apparent self-correction following tokens like "Wait," yet their underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We introduce an information-theoretic framework that decomposes reasoning into procedural information and epistemic verbalization - the explicit externalization of uncertainty that supports downstream control actions. We show that purely procedural reasoning can become informationally stagnant, whereas epistemic verbalization enables continued information acquisition and is critical for achieving information sufficiency. Empirical results demonstrate that strong reasoning performance is driven by uncertainty externalization rather than specific surface tokens. Our framework unifies prior findings on Aha moments and post-training experiments, and offers insights for future reasoning model design.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.15500
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cs.AI
Published: 2026-03-16
Fetched: 2026-03-17 06:02

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15500v1</id>\n    <title>Understanding Reasoning in LLMs through Strategic Information Allocation under Uncertainty</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-16T16:31:24Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15500v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.15500v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>LLMs often exhibit Aha moments during reasoning, such as apparent self-correction following tokens like \"Wait,\" yet their underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We introduce an information-theoretic framework that decomposes reasoning into procedural information and epistemic verbalization - the explicit externalization of uncertainty that supports downstream control actions. We show that purely procedural reasoning can become informationally stagnant, whereas epistemic verbalization enables continued information acquisition and is critical for achieving information sufficiency. Empirical results demonstrate that strong reasoning performance is driven by uncertainty externalization rather than specific surface tokens. Our framework unifies prior findings on Aha moments and post-training experiments, and offers insights for future reasoning model design.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AI'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.LG'/>\n    <published>2026-03-16T16:31:24Z</published>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.AI'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Jeonghye Kim</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Xufang Luo</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Minbeom Kim</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Sangmook Lee</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Dongsheng Li</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Yuqing Yang</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}