Paper
Are Dilemmas and Conflicts in LLM Alignment Solvable? A View from Priority Graph
Authors
Zhenheng Tang, Xiang Liu, Qian Wang, Eunsol Choi, Bo Li, Xiaowen Chu
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become more powerful and autonomous, they increasingly face conflicts and dilemmas in many scenarios. We first summarize and taxonomize these diverse conflicts. Then, we model the LLM's preferences to make different choices as a priority graph, where instructions and values are nodes, and the edges represent context-specific priorities determined by the model's output distribution. This graph reveals that a unified stable LLM alignment is very challenging, because the graph is neither static nor necessarily consistent in different contexts. Besides, it also reveals a potential vulnerability: priority hacking, where adversaries can craft deceptive contexts to manipulate the graph and bypass safety alignments. To counter this, we propose a runtime verification mechanism, enabling LLMs to query external sources to ground their context and resist manipulation. While this approach enhances robustness, we also acknowledge that many ethical and value dilemmas are philosophically irreducible, posing a long-term, open challenge for the future of AI alignment.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15527v1</id>\n <title>Are Dilemmas and Conflicts in LLM Alignment Solvable? A View from Priority Graph</title>\n <updated>2026-03-16T16:53:08Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15527v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.15527v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>As Large Language Models (LLMs) become more powerful and autonomous, they increasingly face conflicts and dilemmas in many scenarios. We first summarize and taxonomize these diverse conflicts. Then, we model the LLM's preferences to make different choices as a priority graph, where instructions and values are nodes, and the edges represent context-specific priorities determined by the model's output distribution. This graph reveals that a unified stable LLM alignment is very challenging, because the graph is neither static nor necessarily consistent in different contexts. Besides, it also reveals a potential vulnerability: priority hacking, where adversaries can craft deceptive contexts to manipulate the graph and bypass safety alignments. To counter this, we propose a runtime verification mechanism, enabling LLMs to query external sources to ground their context and resist manipulation. While this approach enhances robustness, we also acknowledge that many ethical and value dilemmas are philosophically irreducible, posing a long-term, open challenge for the future of AI alignment.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AI'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CY'/>\n <published>2026-03-16T16:53:08Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.AI'/>\n <author>\n <name>Zhenheng Tang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Xiang Liu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Qian Wang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Eunsol Choi</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Bo Li</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Xiaowen Chu</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}