Paper
Investigating student perceptions of creativity and generative ai in computational physics
Authors
Pachi Her, Patti Hamerski
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (gen-AI) is rapidly becoming more integrated into today's classrooms in all ranges of education. In higher education, Gen-AI is often seen as a resource for students, aiding them in drafting outlines, solving simple mathematical problems, or even decoding or constructing code. In this paper, we analyze essay-based interviews (N=6) from an upper-division computational physics course, in which physics majors addressed their views and attitudes towards Gen-AI and how it affects their learning. We analyzed the concepts of creativity and gen-AI using the Four C Model, a framework encompassing four types of creativity. Our analysis of the data involved coding and characterizing students' definitions of creativity and generative AI. Our findings revealed two main observations: first, students conceptualized their creativity primarily within mini-c and little-c; second, students perceived gen-AI as a resource and learning tool but expressed skepticism regarding its accuracy and creativity.
Metadata
Related papers
Gen-Searcher: Reinforcing Agentic Search for Image Generation
Kaituo Feng, Manyuan Zhang, Shuang Chen, Yunlong Lin, Kaixuan Fan, Yilei Jian... • 2026-03-30
On-the-fly Repulsion in the Contextual Space for Rich Diversity in Diffusion Transformers
Omer Dahary, Benaya Koren, Daniel Garibi, Daniel Cohen-Or • 2026-03-30
Graphilosophy: Graph-Based Digital Humanities Computing with The Four Books
Minh-Thu Do, Quynh-Chau Le-Tran, Duc-Duy Nguyen-Mai, Thien-Trang Nguyen, Khan... • 2026-03-30
ParaSpeechCLAP: A Dual-Encoder Speech-Text Model for Rich Stylistic Language-Audio Pretraining
Anuj Diwan, Eunsol Choi, David Harwath • 2026-03-30
RAD-AI: Rethinking Architecture Documentation for AI-Augmented Ecosystems
Oliver Aleksander Larsen, Mahyar T. Moghaddam • 2026-03-30
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12154v1</id>\n <title>Investigating student perceptions of creativity and generative ai in computational physics</title>\n <updated>2026-03-12T16:52:22Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12154v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.12154v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Generative Artificial Intelligence (gen-AI) is rapidly becoming more integrated into today's classrooms in all ranges of education. In higher education, Gen-AI is often seen as a resource for students, aiding them in drafting outlines, solving simple mathematical problems, or even decoding or constructing code. In this paper, we analyze essay-based interviews (N=6) from an upper-division computational physics course, in which physics majors addressed their views and attitudes towards Gen-AI and how it affects their learning. We analyzed the concepts of creativity and gen-AI using the Four C Model, a framework encompassing four types of creativity. Our analysis of the data involved coding and characterizing students' definitions of creativity and generative AI. Our findings revealed two main observations: first, students conceptualized their creativity primarily within mini-c and little-c; second, students perceived gen-AI as a resource and learning tool but expressed skepticism regarding its accuracy and creativity.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='physics.ed-ph'/>\n <published>2026-03-12T16:52:22Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='physics.ed-ph'/>\n <arxiv:journal_ref>2024 PERC Proceedings [Boston, MA, July 10-11, 2024], edited by Q. X. Ryan, A. Pawl, and J. P. Zwolak</arxiv:journal_ref>\n <author>\n <name>Pachi Her</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Patti Hamerski</name>\n </author>\n <arxiv:doi>10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Her</arxiv:doi>\n <link href='https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Her' rel='related' title='doi'/>\n </entry>"
}