Paper
Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats
Authors
Xinhao Deng, Yixiang Zhang, Jiaqing Wu, Jiaqi Bai, Sibo Yi, Zhuoheng Zou, Yue Xiao, Rennai Qiu, Jianan Ma, Jialuo Chen, Xiaohu Du, Xiaofang Yang, Shiwen Cui, Changhua Meng, Weiqiang Wang, Jiaxing Song, Ke Xu, Qi Li
Abstract
Autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents, exemplified by OpenClaw, demonstrate remarkable capabilities in executing complex, long-horizon tasks. However, their tightly coupled instant-messaging interaction paradigm and high-privilege execution capabilities substantially expand the system attack surface. In this paper, we present a comprehensive security threat analysis of OpenClaw. To structure our analysis, we introduce a five-layer lifecycle-oriented security framework that captures key stages of agent operation, i.e., initialization, input, inference, decision, and execution, and systematically examine compound threats across the agent's operational lifecycle, including indirect prompt injection, skill supply chain contamination, memory poisoning, and intent drift. Through detailed case studies on OpenClaw, we demonstrate the prevalence and severity of these threats and analyze the limitations of existing defenses. Our findings reveal critical weaknesses in current point-based defense mechanisms when addressing cross-temporal and multi-stage systemic risks, highlighting the need for holistic security architectures for autonomous LLM agents. Within this framework, we further examine representative defense strategies at each lifecycle stage, including plugin vetting frameworks, context-aware instruction filtering, memory integrity validation protocols, intent verification mechanisms, and capability enforcement architectures.
Metadata
Related papers
Fractal universe and quantum gravity made simple
Fabio Briscese, Gianluca Calcagni • 2026-03-25
POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plan
Marta Moscati, Muhammad Saad Saeed, Marina Zanoni, Mubashir Noman, Rohan Kuma... • 2026-03-25
LensWalk: Agentic Video Understanding by Planning How You See in Videos
Keliang Li, Yansong Li, Hongze Shen, Mengdi Liu, Hong Chang, Shiguang Shan • 2026-03-25
Orientation Reconstruction of Proteins using Coulomb Explosions
Tomas André, Alfredo Bellisario, Nicusor Timneanu, Carl Caleman • 2026-03-25
The role of spatial context and multitask learning in the detection of organic and conventional farming systems based on Sentinel-2 time series
Jan Hemmerling, Marcel Schwieder, Philippe Rufin, Leon-Friedrich Thomas, Mire... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11619v1</id>\n <title>Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats</title>\n <updated>2026-03-12T07:24:05Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11619v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.11619v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents, exemplified by OpenClaw, demonstrate remarkable capabilities in executing complex, long-horizon tasks. However, their tightly coupled instant-messaging interaction paradigm and high-privilege execution capabilities substantially expand the system attack surface. In this paper, we present a comprehensive security threat analysis of OpenClaw. To structure our analysis, we introduce a five-layer lifecycle-oriented security framework that captures key stages of agent operation, i.e., initialization, input, inference, decision, and execution, and systematically examine compound threats across the agent's operational lifecycle, including indirect prompt injection, skill supply chain contamination, memory poisoning, and intent drift. Through detailed case studies on OpenClaw, we demonstrate the prevalence and severity of these threats and analyze the limitations of existing defenses. Our findings reveal critical weaknesses in current point-based defense mechanisms when addressing cross-temporal and multi-stage systemic risks, highlighting the need for holistic security architectures for autonomous LLM agents. Within this framework, we further examine representative defense strategies at each lifecycle stage, including plugin vetting frameworks, context-aware instruction filtering, memory integrity validation protocols, intent verification mechanisms, and capability enforcement architectures.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CR'/>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AI'/>\n <published>2026-03-12T07:24:05Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CR'/>\n <author>\n <name>Xinhao Deng</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yixiang Zhang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jiaqing Wu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jiaqi Bai</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Sibo Yi</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Zhuoheng Zou</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yue Xiao</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Rennai Qiu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jianan Ma</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jialuo Chen</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Xiaohu Du</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Xiaofang Yang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Shiwen Cui</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Changhua Meng</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Weiqiang Wang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Jiaxing Song</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Ke Xu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Qi Li</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}