Paper
QUARE: Multi-Agent Negotiation for Balancing Quality Attributes in Requirements Engineering
Authors
Haowei Cheng, Milhan Kim, Foutse Khomh, Teeradaj Racharak, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Hironori Washizaki
Abstract
Requirements engineering (RE) is critical to software success, yet automating it remains challenging because multiple, often conflicting quality attributes must be balanced while preserving stakeholder intent. Existing Large-Language-Model (LLM) approaches predominantly rely on monolithic reasoning or implicit aggregation, limiting their ability to systematically surface and resolve cross-quality conflicts. We present QUARE (Quality-Aware Requirements Engineering), a multi-agent framework that formulates requirements analysis as structured negotiation among five quality-specialized agents (Safety, Efficiency, Green, Trustworthiness, and Responsibility), coordinated by a dedicated orchestrator. QUARE introduces a dialectical negotiation protocol that explicitly exposes inter-quality conflicts and resolves them through iterative proposal, critique, and synthesis. Negotiated outcomes are transformed into structurally sound KAOS goal models via topology validation and verified against industry standards through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). We evaluate QUARE on five case studies drawn from established RE benchmarks (MARE, iReDev) and an industrial autonomous-driving specification, spanning safety-critical, financial, and information-system domains. Results show that QUARE achieves 98.2% compliance coverage (+105% over both baselines), 94.9% semantic preservation (+2.3 percentage points over the best baseline), and high verifiability (4.96/5.0), while generating 25-43% more requirements than existing multi-agent RE frameworks. These findings suggest that effective RE automation depends less on model scale than on principled architectural decomposition, explicit interaction protocols, and automated verification.
Metadata
Related papers
Fractal universe and quantum gravity made simple
Fabio Briscese, Gianluca Calcagni • 2026-03-25
POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plan
Marta Moscati, Muhammad Saad Saeed, Marina Zanoni, Mubashir Noman, Rohan Kuma... • 2026-03-25
LensWalk: Agentic Video Understanding by Planning How You See in Videos
Keliang Li, Yansong Li, Hongze Shen, Mengdi Liu, Hong Chang, Shiguang Shan • 2026-03-25
Orientation Reconstruction of Proteins using Coulomb Explosions
Tomas André, Alfredo Bellisario, Nicusor Timneanu, Carl Caleman • 2026-03-25
The role of spatial context and multitask learning in the detection of organic and conventional farming systems based on Sentinel-2 time series
Jan Hemmerling, Marcel Schwieder, Philippe Rufin, Leon-Friedrich Thomas, Mire... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11890v1</id>\n <title>QUARE: Multi-Agent Negotiation for Balancing Quality Attributes in Requirements Engineering</title>\n <updated>2026-03-12T13:03:01Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11890v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.11890v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Requirements engineering (RE) is critical to software success, yet automating it remains challenging because multiple, often conflicting quality attributes must be balanced while preserving stakeholder intent. Existing Large-Language-Model (LLM) approaches predominantly rely on monolithic reasoning or implicit aggregation, limiting their ability to systematically surface and resolve cross-quality conflicts. We present QUARE (Quality-Aware Requirements Engineering), a multi-agent framework that formulates requirements analysis as structured negotiation among five quality-specialized agents (Safety, Efficiency, Green, Trustworthiness, and Responsibility), coordinated by a dedicated orchestrator. QUARE introduces a dialectical negotiation protocol that explicitly exposes inter-quality conflicts and resolves them through iterative proposal, critique, and synthesis. Negotiated outcomes are transformed into structurally sound KAOS goal models via topology validation and verified against industry standards through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). We evaluate QUARE on five case studies drawn from established RE benchmarks (MARE, iReDev) and an industrial autonomous-driving specification, spanning safety-critical, financial, and information-system domains. Results show that QUARE achieves 98.2% compliance coverage (+105% over both baselines), 94.9% semantic preservation (+2.3 percentage points over the best baseline), and high verifiability (4.96/5.0), while generating 25-43% more requirements than existing multi-agent RE frameworks. These findings suggest that effective RE automation depends less on model scale than on principled architectural decomposition, explicit interaction protocols, and automated verification.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.SE'/>\n <published>2026-03-12T13:03:01Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.SE'/>\n <author>\n <name>Haowei Cheng</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Milhan Kim</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Foutse Khomh</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Teeradaj Racharak</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Nobukazu Yoshioka</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Naoyasu Ubayashi</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Hironori Washizaki</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}