Research

Paper

TESTING March 11, 2026

Island Sliding Barriers: A first-principles metric for determining remote epitaxy viability

Authors

Quinn T. Campbell, Manny Xavier de Jesus Lopez, Anthony Rice, Timothy J. Ruggles, Taisuke Ohta, Caitlin McCowan, Sadhvikas Addamane, Scott W. Schmucker, Justine Koepke

Abstract

Remote epitaxy, where a 2D van der Waals material (usually graphene) is inserted on top of the substrate before film epitaxy, has emerged as a promising path for growing electronics with lower defect rates and less stringent lattice matching requirements. The exact mechanism behind remote epitaxy has not been definitively shown, however, and it is not obvious when examining a new substrate-film pair whether they would be compatible with the remote epitaxy process. In this paper, we use first principles calculations to test several different mechanisms for determining whether a given substrate-film pair will successfully be grown with remote epitaxy. We find that previously calculated metrics such as electrostatic potential do not hold sufficient explanatory power. We find that the sliding barrier of small islands on the surface when the atomic positions are allowed to optimize provides the most rigorous criteria for whether a given substrate-film pair is remote epitaxy active. This indicates that remote epitaxy is likely a phenomenon related to the kinetics and ease of island migration on the graphene surface.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.10968
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cond-mat.mtrl-sci
Published: 2026-03-11
Fetched: 2026-03-12 04:21

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10968v1</id>\n    <title>Island Sliding Barriers: A first-principles metric for determining remote epitaxy viability</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-11T16:53:18Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10968v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.10968v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>Remote epitaxy, where a 2D van der Waals material (usually graphene) is inserted on top of the substrate before film epitaxy, has emerged as a promising path for growing electronics with lower defect rates and less stringent lattice matching requirements. The exact mechanism behind remote epitaxy has not been definitively shown, however, and it is not obvious when examining a new substrate-film pair whether they would be compatible with the remote epitaxy process. In this paper, we use first principles calculations to test several different mechanisms for determining whether a given substrate-film pair will successfully be grown with remote epitaxy. We find that previously calculated metrics such as electrostatic potential do not hold sufficient explanatory power. We find that the sliding barrier of small islands on the surface when the atomic positions are allowed to optimize provides the most rigorous criteria for whether a given substrate-film pair is remote epitaxy active. This indicates that remote epitaxy is likely a phenomenon related to the kinetics and ease of island migration on the graphene surface.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cond-mat.mtrl-sci'/>\n    <published>2026-03-11T16:53:18Z</published>\n    <arxiv:comment>25 pages, 7 figures</arxiv:comment>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cond-mat.mtrl-sci'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Quinn T. Campbell</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Manny Xavier de Jesus Lopez</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Anthony Rice</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Timothy J. Ruggles</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Taisuke Ohta</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Caitlin McCowan</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Sadhvikas Addamane</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Scott W. Schmucker</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Justine Koepke</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}