Research

Paper

AI LLM March 11, 2026

Chasing RATs: Tracing Reading for and as Creative Activity

Authors

Sophia Liu, Shm Garanganao Almeda

Abstract

Creativity research has privileged making over the interpretive labor that precedes and shapes it. We introduce Reading Activity Traces (RATs), a proposal that treats reading -- broadly defined to include navigating, interpreting, and curating media across interconnected sources -- as creative activity both for future artifacts and as a form of creation in its own right. By tracing trajectories of traversal, association, and reflection as inspectable artifacts, RATs render visible the creative work that algorithmic feeds and AI summarization increasingly compress and automate away. We illustrate this through WikiRAT, a speculative instantiation on Wikipedia, and open new ground for reflective practice, reader modeling, collective sensemaking, and understanding what is lost when human interpretation is automated -- towards designing intelligent tools that preserve it.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.11031
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cs.HC
Published: 2026-03-11
Fetched: 2026-03-12 04:21

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11031v1</id>\n    <title>Chasing RATs: Tracing Reading for and as Creative Activity</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-11T17:54:26Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11031v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.11031v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>Creativity research has privileged making over the interpretive labor that precedes and shapes it. We introduce Reading Activity Traces (RATs), a proposal that treats reading -- broadly defined to include navigating, interpreting, and curating media across interconnected sources -- as creative activity both for future artifacts and as a form of creation in its own right. By tracing trajectories of traversal, association, and reflection as inspectable artifacts, RATs render visible the creative work that algorithmic feeds and AI summarization increasingly compress and automate away. We illustrate this through WikiRAT, a speculative instantiation on Wikipedia, and open new ground for reflective practice, reader modeling, collective sensemaking, and understanding what is lost when human interpretation is automated -- towards designing intelligent tools that preserve it.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.HC'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.IR'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.MM'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.SI'/>\n    <published>2026-03-11T17:54:26Z</published>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.HC'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Sophia Liu</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Shm Garanganao Almeda</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}