Paper
The Architecture of Inter-Level Representation
Authors
Harry Sticker
Abstract
Inter-level connections in science routinely require constructs that neither of the connected theories contains. Statistical mechanics requires assumptions such as the Stosszahlansatz to generate thermodynamic irreversibility - assumptions that Hamiltonian mechanics cannot provide. Quantum chemistry offers four incompatible analyses of chemical bonding for the same quantum state, none of which are selected by the Schrodinger dynamics. Molecular genetics has not converged on a stable definition of the gene despite decades of molecular detail. These are not isolated anomalies but instances of a common architectural pattern. The missing apparatus is the bridge theory: a third theoretical role that connects a dynamical theory to an observational theory through a many-to-one inter-level map. That map generates the contingent space - the set of dynamical states compatible with an observational description but not selected by it - whose geometry neither connected theory determines. Completing the bridge theory requires three conditions in order: a Partition that defines observational equivalence classes; a Magnitude that characterizes the geometry and scale of the contingent space; and a Closure that selects or weights its elements. The framework yields an objective distinction between closing and introducing rules, formalized by the Mirror Test, and supports a tripartite taxonomy of emergence. It explains why some inter-level disputes persist and what would be required to resolve them.
Metadata
Related papers
Cosmic Shear in Effective Field Theory at Two-Loop Order: Revisiting $S_8$ in Dark Energy Survey Data
Shi-Fan Chen, Joseph DeRose, Mikhail M. Ivanov, Oliver H. E. Philcox • 2026-03-30
Stop Probing, Start Coding: Why Linear Probes and Sparse Autoencoders Fail at Compositional Generalisation
Vitória Barin Pacela, Shruti Joshi, Isabela Camacho, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Da... • 2026-03-30
SNID-SAGE: A Modern Framework for Interactive Supernova Classification and Spectral Analysis
Fiorenzo Stoppa, Stephen J. Smartt • 2026-03-30
Acoustic-to-articulatory Inversion of the Complete Vocal Tract from RT-MRI with Various Audio Embeddings and Dataset Sizes
Sofiane Azzouz, Pierre-André Vuissoz, Yves Laprie • 2026-03-30
Rotating black hole shadows in metric-affine bumblebee gravity
Jose R. Nascimento, Ana R. M. Oliveira, Albert Yu. Petrov, Paulo J. Porfírio,... • 2026-03-30
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09626v1</id>\n <title>The Architecture of Inter-Level Representation</title>\n <updated>2026-03-10T13:05:04Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09626v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.09626v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Inter-level connections in science routinely require constructs that neither of the connected theories contains. Statistical mechanics requires assumptions such as the Stosszahlansatz to generate thermodynamic irreversibility - assumptions that Hamiltonian mechanics cannot provide. Quantum chemistry offers four incompatible analyses of chemical bonding for the same quantum state, none of which are selected by the Schrodinger dynamics. Molecular genetics has not converged on a stable definition of the gene despite decades of molecular detail. These are not isolated anomalies but instances of a common architectural pattern.\n The missing apparatus is the bridge theory: a third theoretical role that connects a dynamical theory to an observational theory through a many-to-one inter-level map. That map generates the contingent space - the set of dynamical states compatible with an observational description but not selected by it - whose geometry neither connected theory determines. Completing the bridge theory requires three conditions in order: a Partition that defines observational equivalence classes; a Magnitude that characterizes the geometry and scale of the contingent space; and a Closure that selects or weights its elements. The framework yields an objective distinction between closing and introducing rules, formalized by the Mirror Test, and supports a tripartite taxonomy of emergence. It explains why some inter-level disputes persist and what would be required to resolve them.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='physics.hist-ph'/>\n <published>2026-03-10T13:05:04Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='physics.hist-ph'/>\n <author>\n <name>Harry Sticker</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}