Paper
How students use generative AI for computational modeling in physics
Authors
Karl Henrik Fredly, Tor Ole Odden, Benjamin M. Zwickl
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is becoming increasingly prevalent and capable in physics, particularly for programming-related tasks. How, then, does genAI affect students' computational modeling? We interviewed 19 students who had recently completed an open-ended computational assignment that encouraged the use of genAI, asking them how they used it. We then conducted a thematic analysis of these interviews using a framework for computational modeling in physics. We found that genAI significantly impacts several aspects of students' computational modeling, such as the planning, implementing, and debugging of computational models. GenAI can also help students find resources and introduce them to new computational tools. Productive use of genAI was associated with students limiting its use to small steps in the modeling process and consistently double-checking the formulas, explanations, and code it provided. We also identified challenges students faced due to an over-reliance on genAI, such as working from false model assumptions and not learning the fundamentals of computational modeling, especially debugging. Finally, we discuss implications for teaching, such as the need to teach students how to use genAI productively and to urge them to plan before they code. We also highlight the continued value of low-stakes assessment and teaching assistants for teaching computational modeling, as the task remains difficult even with the introduction of genAI.
Metadata
Related papers
Gen-Searcher: Reinforcing Agentic Search for Image Generation
Kaituo Feng, Manyuan Zhang, Shuang Chen, Yunlong Lin, Kaixuan Fan, Yilei Jian... • 2026-03-30
On-the-fly Repulsion in the Contextual Space for Rich Diversity in Diffusion Transformers
Omer Dahary, Benaya Koren, Daniel Garibi, Daniel Cohen-Or • 2026-03-30
Graphilosophy: Graph-Based Digital Humanities Computing with The Four Books
Minh-Thu Do, Quynh-Chau Le-Tran, Duc-Duy Nguyen-Mai, Thien-Trang Nguyen, Khan... • 2026-03-30
ParaSpeechCLAP: A Dual-Encoder Speech-Text Model for Rich Stylistic Language-Audio Pretraining
Anuj Diwan, Eunsol Choi, David Harwath • 2026-03-30
RAD-AI: Rethinking Architecture Documentation for AI-Augmented Ecosystems
Oliver Aleksander Larsen, Mahyar T. Moghaddam • 2026-03-30
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06342v1</id>\n <title>How students use generative AI for computational modeling in physics</title>\n <updated>2026-03-06T14:48:04Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06342v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.06342v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is becoming increasingly prevalent and capable in physics, particularly for programming-related tasks. How, then, does genAI affect students' computational modeling? We interviewed 19 students who had recently completed an open-ended computational assignment that encouraged the use of genAI, asking them how they used it. We then conducted a thematic analysis of these interviews using a framework for computational modeling in physics. We found that genAI significantly impacts several aspects of students' computational modeling, such as the planning, implementing, and debugging of computational models. GenAI can also help students find resources and introduce them to new computational tools. Productive use of genAI was associated with students limiting its use to small steps in the modeling process and consistently double-checking the formulas, explanations, and code it provided. We also identified challenges students faced due to an over-reliance on genAI, such as working from false model assumptions and not learning the fundamentals of computational modeling, especially debugging. Finally, we discuss implications for teaching, such as the need to teach students how to use genAI productively and to urge them to plan before they code. We also highlight the continued value of low-stakes assessment and teaching assistants for teaching computational modeling, as the task remains difficult even with the introduction of genAI.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='physics.ed-ph'/>\n <published>2026-03-06T14:48:04Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='physics.ed-ph'/>\n <author>\n <name>Karl Henrik Fredly</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Tor Ole Odden</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Benjamin M. Zwickl</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}