Research

Paper

AI LLM March 06, 2026

Abductive Reasoning with Syllogistic Forms in Large Language Models

Authors

Hirohiko Abe, Risako Ando, Takanobu Morishita Kentaro Ozeki, Koji Mineshima, Mitsuhiro Okada

Abstract

Research in AI using Large-Language Models (LLMs) is rapidly evolving, and the comparison of their performance with human reasoning has become a key concern. Prior studies have indicated that LLMs and humans share similar biases, such as dismissing logically valid inferences that contradict common beliefs. However, criticizing LLMs for these biases might be unfair, considering our reasoning not only involves formal deduction but also abduction, which draws tentative conclusions from limited information. Abduction can be regarded as the inverse form of syllogism in its basic structure, that is, a process of drawing a minor premise from a major premise and conclusion. This paper explores the accuracy of LLMs in abductive reasoning by converting a syllogistic dataset into one suitable for abduction. It aims to investigate whether the state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit biases in abduction and to identify potential areas for improvement, emphasizing the importance of contextualized reasoning beyond formal deduction. This investigation is vital for advancing the understanding and application of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks, offering insights into bridging the gap between machine and human cognition.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2603.06428
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cs.CL
Published: 2026-03-06
Fetched: 2026-03-09 06:05

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06428v1</id>\n    <title>Abductive Reasoning with Syllogistic Forms in Large Language Models</title>\n    <updated>2026-03-06T16:06:25Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06428v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.06428v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>Research in AI using Large-Language Models (LLMs) is rapidly evolving, and the comparison of their performance with human reasoning has become a key concern. Prior studies have indicated that LLMs and humans share similar biases, such as dismissing logically valid inferences that contradict common beliefs. However, criticizing LLMs for these biases might be unfair, considering our reasoning not only involves formal deduction but also abduction, which draws tentative conclusions from limited information. Abduction can be regarded as the inverse form of syllogism in its basic structure, that is, a process of drawing a minor premise from a major premise and conclusion. This paper explores the accuracy of LLMs in abductive reasoning by converting a syllogistic dataset into one suitable for abduction. It aims to investigate whether the state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit biases in abduction and to identify potential areas for improvement, emphasizing the importance of contextualized reasoning beyond formal deduction. This investigation is vital for advancing the understanding and application of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks, offering insights into bridging the gap between machine and human cognition.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CL'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AI'/>\n    <published>2026-03-06T16:06:25Z</published>\n    <arxiv:comment>Published in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human and Artificial Rationalities (HAR 2024), LNCS 15504, pp. 3-17</arxiv:comment>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CL'/>\n    <arxiv:journal_ref>Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15504, pp. 3-17, 2024</arxiv:journal_ref>\n    <author>\n      <name>Hirohiko Abe</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Risako Ando</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Takanobu Morishita Kentaro Ozeki</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Koji Mineshima</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Mitsuhiro Okada</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}