Paper
Evaluating the Predictability of Selected Weather Extremes with Aurora, an AI Weather Forecast Model
Authors
Qin Huang, Moyan Liu, Yeongbin Kwon, Upmanu Lall
Abstract
AI weather foundation models now achieve forecast skill comparable to numerical weather prediction at far lower computational cost, yet their predictability for high-impact extremes across dynamical regimes remains uncertain. We evaluate Aurora using an event-based framework spanning tropical cyclones, freezes, heatwaves, atmospheric rivers, and extreme precipitation at lead times from 1 to 21 days. Aurora demonstrates strong short-range (1-7 day) skill across event types, including competitive tropical cyclone track accuracy and high spatial agreement for temperature and moisture extremes. However, a consistent subseasonal failure mode emerges: while large-scale circulation patterns remain moderately skillful at 14-21 day leads, threshold-based extreme intensity collapses as fields regress toward climatology. This divergence indicates that Aurora retains synoptic-scale dynamical structure but loses surface-impact amplitude beyond 7-10 days. The practical predictability horizon for deterministic AI extreme-event forecasting therefore remains constrained by intrinsic atmospheric dynamics.
Metadata
Related papers
Gen-Searcher: Reinforcing Agentic Search for Image Generation
Kaituo Feng, Manyuan Zhang, Shuang Chen, Yunlong Lin, Kaixuan Fan, Yilei Jian... • 2026-03-30
On-the-fly Repulsion in the Contextual Space for Rich Diversity in Diffusion Transformers
Omer Dahary, Benaya Koren, Daniel Garibi, Daniel Cohen-Or • 2026-03-30
Graphilosophy: Graph-Based Digital Humanities Computing with The Four Books
Minh-Thu Do, Quynh-Chau Le-Tran, Duc-Duy Nguyen-Mai, Thien-Trang Nguyen, Khan... • 2026-03-30
ParaSpeechCLAP: A Dual-Encoder Speech-Text Model for Rich Stylistic Language-Audio Pretraining
Anuj Diwan, Eunsol Choi, David Harwath • 2026-03-30
RAD-AI: Rethinking Architecture Documentation for AI-Augmented Ecosystems
Oliver Aleksander Larsen, Mahyar T. Moghaddam • 2026-03-30
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06516v1</id>\n <title>Evaluating the Predictability of Selected Weather Extremes with Aurora, an AI Weather Forecast Model</title>\n <updated>2026-03-06T17:55:08Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06516v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.06516v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>AI weather foundation models now achieve forecast skill comparable to numerical weather prediction at far lower computational cost, yet their predictability for high-impact extremes across dynamical regimes remains uncertain. We evaluate Aurora using an event-based framework spanning tropical cyclones, freezes, heatwaves, atmospheric rivers, and extreme precipitation at lead times from 1 to 21 days. Aurora demonstrates strong short-range (1-7 day) skill across event types, including competitive tropical cyclone track accuracy and high spatial agreement for temperature and moisture extremes. However, a consistent subseasonal failure mode emerges: while large-scale circulation patterns remain moderately skillful at 14-21 day leads, threshold-based extreme intensity collapses as fields regress toward climatology. This divergence indicates that Aurora retains synoptic-scale dynamical structure but loses surface-impact amplitude beyond 7-10 days. The practical predictability horizon for deterministic AI extreme-event forecasting therefore remains constrained by intrinsic atmospheric dynamics.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='physics.ao-ph'/>\n <published>2026-03-06T17:55:08Z</published>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='physics.ao-ph'/>\n <author>\n <name>Qin Huang</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Moyan Liu</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Yeongbin Kwon</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Upmanu Lall</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}