Paper
Statistical Confidence in Functional Correctness: An Approach for AI Product Functional Correctness Evaluation
Authors
Wallace Albertini, Marina Condé Araújo, Júlia Condé Araújo, Antonio Pedro Santos Alves, Marcos Kalinowski
Abstract
The quality assessment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems is a fundamental challenge due to their inherently probabilistic nature. Standards such as ISO/IEC 25059 provide a quality model, but they lack practical and statistically robust methods for assessing functional correctness. This paper proposes and evaluates the Statistical Confidence in Functional Correctness (SCFC) approach, which seeks to fill this gap by connecting business requirements to a measure of statistical confidence that considers both the model's average performance and its variability. The approach consists of four steps: defining quantitative specification limits, performing stratified and probabilistic sampling, applying bootstrapping to estimate a confidence interval for the performance metric, and calculating a capability index as a final indicator. The approach was evaluated through a case study on two real-world AI systems in industry involving interviews with AI experts. Valuable insights were collected from the experts regarding the utility, ease of use, and intention to adopt the methodology in practical scenarios. We conclude that the proposed approach is a feasible and valuable way to operationalize the assessment of functional correctness, moving the evaluation from a point estimate to a statement of statistical confidence.
Metadata
Related papers
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Ruofei Du, Benjamin Hersh, David Li, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, Yanhe Chen, Zhongy... • 2026-03-25
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu, Shyam Agarwal, Tongshuang Wu, Chris Donah... • 2026-03-25
The Stochastic Gap: A Markovian Framework for Pre-Deployment Reliability and Oversight-Cost Auditing in Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Biplab Pal, Santanu Bhattacharya • 2026-03-25
Retrieval Improvements Do Not Guarantee Better Answers: A Study of RAG for AI Policy QA
Saahil Mathur, Ryan David Rittner, Vedant Ajit Thakur, Daniel Stuart Schiff, ... • 2026-03-25
MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie... • 2026-03-25
Raw Data (Debug)
{
"raw_xml": "<entry>\n <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18357v1</id>\n <title>Statistical Confidence in Functional Correctness: An Approach for AI Product Functional Correctness Evaluation</title>\n <updated>2026-02-20T17:06:38Z</updated>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18357v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.18357v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n <summary>The quality assessment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems is a fundamental challenge due to their inherently probabilistic nature. Standards such as ISO/IEC 25059 provide a quality model, but they lack practical and statistically robust methods for assessing functional correctness. This paper proposes and evaluates the Statistical Confidence in Functional Correctness (SCFC) approach, which seeks to fill this gap by connecting business requirements to a measure of statistical confidence that considers both the model's average performance and its variability. The approach consists of four steps: defining quantitative specification limits, performing stratified and probabilistic sampling, applying bootstrapping to estimate a confidence interval for the performance metric, and calculating a capability index as a final indicator. The approach was evaluated through a case study on two real-world AI systems in industry involving interviews with AI experts. Valuable insights were collected from the experts regarding the utility, ease of use, and intention to adopt the methodology in practical scenarios. We conclude that the proposed approach is a feasible and valuable way to operationalize the assessment of functional correctness, moving the evaluation from a point estimate to a statement of statistical confidence.</summary>\n <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.SE'/>\n <published>2026-02-20T17:06:38Z</published>\n <arxiv:comment>Author version of the paper accepted for publication at CAIN 2026</arxiv:comment>\n <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.SE'/>\n <author>\n <name>Wallace Albertini</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Marina Condé Araújo</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Júlia Condé Araújo</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Antonio Pedro Santos Alves</name>\n </author>\n <author>\n <name>Marcos Kalinowski</name>\n </author>\n </entry>"
}