Paper

{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24119v1</id>\n    <title>Terminology Rarity Predicts Catastrophic Failure in LLM Translation of Low-Resource Ancient Languages: Evidence from Ancient Greek</title>\n    <updated>2026-02-27T15:57:15Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24119v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.24119v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>This study presents the first systematic, reference-free human evaluation of large language model (LLM) machine translation (MT) for Ancient Greek (AG) technical prose. We evaluate translations by three commercial LLMs (Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT) of twenty paragraph-length passages from two works by the Greek physician Galen of Pergamum (ca. 129-216 CE): On Mixtures, which has two published English translations, and On the Composition of Drugs according to Kinds, which has never been fully translated into English. We assess translation quality using both standard automated evaluation metrics (BLEU, chrF++, METEOR, ROUGE-L, BERTScore, COMET, BLEURT) and expert human evaluation via a modified Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) framework applied to all 60 translations by a team of domain specialists. On the previously translated expository text, LLMs achieved high translation quality (mean MQM score 95.2/100), with performance approaching expert level. On the untranslated pharmacological text, aggregate quality was lower (79.9/100) but with high variance driven by two passages presenting extreme terminological density; excluding these, scores converged to within 4 points of the translated text. Terminology rarity, operationalized via corpus frequency in the literary Diorisis Ancient Greek Corpus, emerged as a strong predictor of translation failure (r = -.97 for passage-level quality on the untranslated text). Automated metrics showed moderate correlation with human judgment overall on the text with a wide quality spread (Composition), but no metric discriminated among high-quality translations. We discuss implications for the use of LLMs in Classical scholarship and for the design of automated evaluation pipelines for low-resource ancient languages.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CL'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.AI'/>\n    <published>2026-02-27T15:57:15Z</published>\n    <arxiv:comment>Article + supplementary information</arxiv:comment>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CL'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>James L. Zainaldin</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Cameron Pattison</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Manuela Marai</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Jacob Wu</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Mark J. Schiefsky</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}