Research

Paper

AI LLM February 19, 2026

Patch-Based Spatial Authorship Attribution in Human-Robot Collaborative Paintings

Authors

Eric Chen, Patricia Alves-Oliveira

Abstract

As agentic AI becomes increasingly involved in creative production, documenting authorship has become critical for artists, collectors, and legal contexts. We present a patch-based framework for spatial authorship attribution within human-robot collaborative painting practice, demonstrated through a forensic case study of one human artist and one robotic system across 15 abstract paintings. Using commodity flatbed scanners and leave-one-painting-out cross-validation, the approach achieves 88.8% patch-level accuracy (86.7% painting-level via majority vote), outperforming texture-based and pretrained-feature baselines (68.0%-84.7%). For collaborative artworks, where ground truth is inherently ambiguous, we use conditional Shannon entropy to quantify stylistic overlap; manually annotated hybrid regions exhibit 64% higher uncertainty than pure paintings (p=0.003), suggesting the model detects mixed authorship rather than classification failure. The trained model is specific to this human-robot pair but provides a methodological grounding for sample-efficient attribution in data-scarce human-AI creative workflows that, in the future, has the potential to extend authorship attribution to any human-robot collaborative painting.

Metadata

arXiv ID: 2602.17030
Provider: ARXIV
Primary Category: cs.CV
Published: 2026-02-19
Fetched: 2026-02-21 18:51

Related papers

Raw Data (Debug)
{
  "raw_xml": "<entry>\n    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17030v1</id>\n    <title>Patch-Based Spatial Authorship Attribution in Human-Robot Collaborative Paintings</title>\n    <updated>2026-02-19T02:51:30Z</updated>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17030v1' rel='alternate' type='text/html'/>\n    <link href='https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.17030v1' rel='related' title='pdf' type='application/pdf'/>\n    <summary>As agentic AI becomes increasingly involved in creative production, documenting authorship has become critical for artists, collectors, and legal contexts. We present a patch-based framework for spatial authorship attribution within human-robot collaborative painting practice, demonstrated through a forensic case study of one human artist and one robotic system across 15 abstract paintings. Using commodity flatbed scanners and leave-one-painting-out cross-validation, the approach achieves 88.8% patch-level accuracy (86.7% painting-level via majority vote), outperforming texture-based and pretrained-feature baselines (68.0%-84.7%). For collaborative artworks, where ground truth is inherently ambiguous, we use conditional Shannon entropy to quantify stylistic overlap; manually annotated hybrid regions exhibit 64% higher uncertainty than pure paintings (p=0.003), suggesting the model detects mixed authorship rather than classification failure. The trained model is specific to this human-robot pair but provides a methodological grounding for sample-efficient attribution in data-scarce human-AI creative workflows that, in the future, has the potential to extend authorship attribution to any human-robot collaborative painting.</summary>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.CV'/>\n    <category scheme='http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom' term='cs.RO'/>\n    <published>2026-02-19T02:51:30Z</published>\n    <arxiv:primary_category term='cs.CV'/>\n    <author>\n      <name>Eric Chen</name>\n    </author>\n    <author>\n      <name>Patricia Alves-Oliveira</name>\n    </author>\n  </entry>"
}